Talk:sunrise

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Talk:sunrise. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Talk:sunrise, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Talk:sunrise in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Talk:sunrise you have here. The definition of the word Talk:sunrise will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofTalk:sunrise, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

Proposal

There doesn't appear to be a Wiktionary entry for the term "galaxyrise", the galaxy analog of a sunrise. Does anyone support the creation of such an entry? 71.236.253.188 21:07, 27 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Have you made this word up yourself? If so, use WT:LOP. Equinox 17:21, 28 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
While you're at it, throw in "galaxyset" and "galaxyshine". 67.171.222.203 15:53, 19 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

RFV discussion: September–October 2016

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.


sunrise: Is it really an adjective?

It is a noun in the example. Merriam Webster also doesn't say it is an adjective. I suspect it isn't an adjective. Yurivict (talk) 01:37, 4 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Here's one, although I'm not sure what it means:
Lua error in Module:quote at line 2971: Parameter 1 is required.
DTLHS (talk) 01:53, 4 September 2016 (UTC)Reply
Maybe it should be labeled as rare? Yurivict (talk) 02:15, 4 September 2016 (UTC)Reply
Sure, if two more uses can be found. DTLHS (talk) 02:20, 4 September 2016 (UTC)Reply
That's a different sense, even if two more citations are found. It's just the attributive use of the noun, I'd prefer to speedily delete these when they're blatant as we have so many of them. Renard Migrant (talk) 15:07, 7 September 2016 (UTC)Reply