Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Talk:to be honest. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Talk:to be honest, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Talk:to be honest in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Talk:to be honest you have here. The definition of the word Talk:to be honest will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofTalk:to be honest, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
In this case, "be honest" is not used in the same bracketed way as to be honest. "To be honest" just seems to be a standard phrasal construction to me. As a native speaker, I am less naturally sensitive to what is or is not idiomatic in the case of some common collocations. DCDuringTALK15:41, 7 July 2009 (UTC)Reply
In all fairness, I like the speech-act argument. But, in all honesty, even if sentence adverbs are truly speech acts, many do not seem worth inclusion. Not to put too fine a point on it, it seems possible to construct an enormous variety of sentence adverbs (or structures of similar force as speech acts) in the form of prepositional phrases as well as infinitives and gerunds. Digging more deeply, I wonder whether it is not true that any English collocation could not be put into a context where it is a speech act. To be brutally honest, sentence adverbs seem like the least meritorious of the speech acts for inclusion, if, indeed, they are best consdiered as speech acts. Quite possibly, there needs to be a line drawn. To add another related point, we are quickly demonstrating that WT:CFI and WT:IDIOM may need a bit more work, at least in this regard. DCDuringTALK18:03, 16 July 2009 (UTC)Reply
to be frank seems okay to me too, and to be (perfectly/totally) honest is just to be honest + adverb, so that is sum of parts. I still think we should keep these. Might as well close this with a keep (more than 30 days without a vote) but I'll close it tomorrow morning as the consensus is a weak one. Mglovesfun (talk) 10:03, 20 August 2009 (UTC)Reply