Template:en-lemming test/documentation

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Template:en-lemming test/documentation. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Template:en-lemming test/documentation, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Template:en-lemming test/documentation in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Template:en-lemming test/documentation you have here. The definition of the word Template:en-lemming test/documentation will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofTemplate:en-lemming test/documentation, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
Documentation for Template:en-lemming test.
This page contains usage information, categories, interwiki links and other content describing the template.

Usage

This template gathers several reference templates that lead to an entry in online dictionaries.

It should not be used directly in entries; it is meant to smooth out RFD procedures, by helping to check the presence of multiwords entries or idioms in other dictionaries. The idea is that if several other dictionaries have an entry for a certain word, maybe Wiktionary should have it too (herdthink or lemming logic).

It takes one optional parameter. If left empty, it fetches the page title automatically.

Example:

{{en-lemming test|nowhere near}}

gives

nowhere near (Check: CB, CD, CO, LX, LM, MM, MW, OL, TFD).

Warning

Given that there's no normalisation between dictionaries, the results can be deceitful. For example, lose one's head is found under that form in Merriam-Webster, Collins and Oxford Dictionaries Online, but under lose your head in Macmillan, Cambridge Dictionary and Longman. There will thus be many false negatives.

{{en-lemming test|lose one's head}}

gives

lose one's head (Check: CB, CD, CO, LX, LM, MM, MW, OL, TFD)

A solution would be to allow for searching several alternative forms simultaneously, but it's currently impossible technically.

Ideas for improvement:

  • return result of query: “no headword found in...”
  • sum up the successful queries. "> 5" is probably a good indicator that we should have it.