Template talk:None

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Template talk:None. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Template talk:None, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Template talk:None in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Template talk:None you have here. The definition of the word Template talk:None will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofTemplate talk:None, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

Deletion debate

The following information passed a request for deletion.

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


Template:None

All it does is print the first parameter. Why is this template needed? -- Prince Kassad 14:11, 19 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Seems to be to combat the auto-script effects of {{Xyzy}} (which itself should probably be deleted). I understand the logic - problem is, the default script settings are the same as for {{Latn}} anyway, which is why ] and {{l|en|house}} are exactly equivalent. So in the cases where it is used, it should just use sc=Latn (unless someone can find a counter-argument). Mglovesfun (talk) 01:03, 20 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
I agree, {{Xyzy}} is one of those experiments by Ullmann which have more negative effects than positive ones. -- Prince Kassad 22:34, 20 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
Keep as it has been modified since this discussion started. Mglovesfun (talk) 21:33, 27 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Kept: Consensus indicates that we should have Template:None as long as we have Template:Xyzy. (In addition, let me remind that Template:list:days of the week/ar uses {{None}} to avoid using {{Arab}} twice for the same text, which would make the text much bigger than it should, which is an additional reason to keep the template in question.) --Daniel. 14:07, 21 May 2011 (UTC)Reply