Template talk:R:metawiki

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Template talk:R:metawiki. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Template talk:R:metawiki, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Template talk:R:metawiki in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Template talk:R:metawiki you have here. The definition of the word Template talk:R:metawiki will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofTemplate talk:R:metawiki, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

Deletion debate

The following information has failed Wiktionary's deletion process.

It should not be re-entered without careful consideration.


Template:meta

I doubt that any of our entries or categories or whatnot would benefit from having a link to Meta added, which is mostly just a collection of boring mud wars. -- Liliana 02:39, 28 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Same -- Liliana 06:03, 28 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Delete both templates. How could these ever be used? On discussion pages surely you'd just use ,"framed":false,"label":"Reply","flags":,"classes":}'>Reply

Have they been used (and were orphaned for the RFD)? If so, keep. I can see that they would be useful in the Wiktionary: namespace. (Also the User talk: namespace had we not outlawed userboxes.) If they haven't been used, I abstain.​—msh210 (talk) 17:53, 2 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

They were not used at all when I nominated them for deletion. -- Liliana 17:13, 3 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
Both deleted. User: PalkiaX50 talk to meh 01:18, 26 July 2012 (UTC)Reply
Nooooooo.... My namesake (sort of, not really) is dead... --Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 01:27, 26 July 2012 (UTC)Reply
But the knowledge of it lives on... Chuck Entz (talk) 03:05, 26 July 2012 (UTC)Reply