Template talk:U:nl:obsolete spelling
Documentation
Use this template in the ===Usage notes=== section of a Dutch word to indicate that the spelling was deprecated in a Dutch spelling reform.
Examples
===Usage notes===
{{U:nl:obsolete spelling}}
The spelling U:nl:obsolete spelling was deprecated in a Dutch spelling reform.
===Usage notes===
{{U:nl:obsolete spelling|1804}}
The spelling U:nl:obsolete spelling was deprecated in 1804 in the first official Dutch spelling reform, Verhandeling over de Nederduitsche spelling ter bevordering van de eenparigheid in dezelve (“Treatise on Lower Dutch spelling to promote uniformity herein”).
===Usage notes===
{{U:nl:obsolete spelling|1844}}
The spelling U:nl:obsolete spelling was deprecated in 1844 in the Willems spelling reform.
===Usage notes===
{{U:nl:obsolete spelling|1864}}
The spelling U:nl:obsolete spelling was deprecated in 1864 in the spelling reforms of De Vries and Te Winkel, De grondbeginselen der Nederlandsche spelling. Ontwerp der spelling voor het aanstaande Nederlandsch Woordenboek (“The foundations of Dutch spelling. Project for the spelling of the forthcoming Dutch Dictionary spelling”).
===Usage notes===
{{U:nl:obsolete spelling|1883}}
The spelling U:nl:obsolete spelling was deprecated in 1883 in the spelling reforms of De Vries and Te Winkel, De grondbeginselen der Nederlandsche spelling. Ontwerp der spelling voor het aanstaande Nederlandsch Woordenboek (“The foundations of Dutch spelling. Project for the spelling of the forthcoming Dutch Dictionary spelling”).
===Usage notes===
{{U:nl:obsolete spelling|1891}}
The spelling U:nl:obsolete spelling was deprecated in 1891 in the Dutch spelling proposal Onze lastige spelling. Een voorstel tot vereenvoudiging (“Our awkward spelling: a proposal for simplification”).
===Usage notes===
{{U:nl:obsolete spelling|1946}}
The spelling U:nl:obsolete spelling was deprecated in 1946 in het Groene Boekje (“The Little Green Book”) spelling reform.
===Usage notes===
{{U:nl:obsolete spelling|1947}}
The spelling U:nl:obsolete spelling was deprecated in 1947 in het Groene Boekje (“The Little Green Book”) spelling reform.
===Usage notes===
{{U:nl:obsolete spelling|1996}}
The spelling U:nl:obsolete spelling was deprecated in 1996 in the new Groene Boekje (“Little Green Book”) spelling reform.
===Usage notes===
{{U:nl:obsolete spelling|2005}}
The spelling U:nl:obsolete spelling was deprecated in 2005 in an update to het Groene Bookje (“the Little Green Book”).
===Usage notes===
{{U:nl:obsolete spelling|2006}}
The spelling U:nl:obsolete spelling was deprecated in 2006 in an update to het Groene Bookje (“the Little Green Book”).
===Usage notes===
{{U:nl:obsolete spelling|''any arbitrary date''}}
The spelling U:nl:obsolete spelling was deprecated in any arbitrary date in a Dutch spelling reform.
Discussion
RFDO discussion: July 2014–May 2015
The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for deletion/Others (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
As I was standardizing the naming of our usage note templates, I noticed that they weren't used anywhere. So, should we start using them in entries, or delete them? - -sche (discuss) 03:57, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
- @CodeCat this template is currently unused, but it looks like there are places it could be used, like persé vs per se. Should we start deploying it to entries or would it be better to delete it? - -sche (discuss) 21:01, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
- It's probably more useful to have separate templates for each spelling reform. This one is really too vague. —CodeCat 22:17, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
- Like Template:U:de:deprecated spelling, this template accepts parameters which specify which spelling reform did the deprecating. (And like Template:U:de:deprecated spelling et al, the wording may need to be adjusted.) - -sche (discuss) 22:30, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
- So keep, and use like Template:U:de:deprecated spelling. (@CodeCat isn't one template that accepts parameters betetr than several templates one per spelling reform?) - -sche (discuss) 17:35, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
- Like Template:U:de:deprecated spelling, this template accepts parameters which specify which spelling reform did the deprecating. (And like Template:U:de:deprecated spelling et al, the wording may need to be adjusted.) - -sche (discuss) 22:30, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
- It's probably more useful to have separate templates for each spelling reform. This one is really too vague. —CodeCat 22:17, 9 February 2015 (UTC)