Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Template talk:cite wikipedia. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Template talk:cite wikipedia, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Template talk:cite wikipedia in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Template talk:cite wikipedia you have here. The definition of the word Template talk:cite wikipedia will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofTemplate talk:cite wikipedia, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
Latest comment: 16 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion
Really, now, do these count as in "durably archived media"? I don't think so- the text on Wikipedia can be altered at any time, that doesn't work with our CFI. Therefore, citations from Wikipedia are useless therefore so is this template. Teh Rote00:19, 6 October 2008 (UTC)Reply
What if it contained a permalink to a specific revision? Those are at least as durable as Usenet posts. Anyway, see Category:New words from Wikipedia for an explanation of the project underlying this; there is no intention that these would meet CFI by themselves, but just that they would provide a starting point. Keep. -- Visviva06:04, 6 October 2008 (UTC)Reply
There is no suggestion that a wikipedia cite would "count" for CFI. Only that it is an illustrative quotation for aw word we don't have, and may (or may not) be useful as an example of usage in the entry. (Hence no attempt to link a durably archived revision, as it isn't trying to meet the CFI requirement.) Keep. Robert Ullmann11:53, 6 October 2008 (UTC)Reply
