Nadando 08:03, 26 November 2008 (UTC) There's a spurious ")" when using {{<span class="searchmatch">en</span>-<span class="searchmatch">adj</span>|-}} in the table layout view (and an extra </span> too). --Bequw → ¢ • τ...
Call: {{<span class="searchmatch">en</span>-<span class="searchmatch">adj</span>}} Expected: test (comparative more test, suparlative most test) test (comparative more test, superlative most test) Call: {{<span class="searchmatch">en</span>-<span class="searchmatch">adj</span>|er}} Expected:...
{{<span class="searchmatch">en</span>-<span class="searchmatch">adj</span>}}, which allows one to indicate noncomparability with a parameter "-". In Turkish it likewise doesn't make sense to use daha eşsiz or <span class="searchmatch">en</span> eşsiz...
Can we allow {{<span class="searchmatch">en</span>-adv|?}} to display no inflection, at {{<span class="searchmatch">en</span>-noun}} and {{<span class="searchmatch">en</span>-<span class="searchmatch">adj</span>}} allow? I think it's pretty uncontroversial, but given the widespread...
November 2009 (UTC) The consistent solution is {{sh-<span class="searchmatch">adj</span>}}, as in <span class="searchmatch">en</span>-<span class="searchmatch">adj</span>, fr-<span class="searchmatch">adj</span>, es-<span class="searchmatch">adj</span>, it-<span class="searchmatch">adj</span>, nl-<span class="searchmatch">adj</span> (the list goes on into the dozens). That said, as...
without careful consideration. This template is so old that it does not use {{<span class="searchmatch">en</span>-<span class="searchmatch">adj</span>}}. I think that shows that nobody actually uses it because nobody bothered...
change es-<span class="searchmatch">adj</span> to use the same table form as <span class="searchmatch">en</span>-noun it would look very familiar ;-) My point is that the is probably as simple as: es-<span class="searchmatch">adj</span> is using the...
@Benwing2. We have <span class="searchmatch">en</span>-noun, <span class="searchmatch">en</span>-verb, <span class="searchmatch">en</span>-<span class="searchmatch">adj</span> etc. so what was wrong with this one? Not having to use it seems like yet another illogical inconsistency to...
{{fr-<span class="searchmatch">adj</span>}} directly, and could be orphaned with a simple subst:. Deletion logic: let's not use four templates where one will do. I'd compare it to {{<span class="searchmatch">en</span>-noun-es}}...
nl-decl-adj-nocomp for incomparable adjectives, and nl-decl-<span class="searchmatch">adj</span>-noinf for adjectives in -<span class="searchmatch">en</span>, which get no -e in the absolute and comparative degree. However...