Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word
Template talk:feminine of. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word
Template talk:feminine of, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say
Template talk:feminine of in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word
Template talk:feminine of you have here. The definition of the word
Template talk:feminine of will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition of
Template talk:feminine of, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
I'd say please use ] instead of ]
--Jerome Potts 04:12, 29 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Currently this template doesn't link to the appropriate language section, even when lang= is provided. Could this be fixed please? —CodeCat 11:12, 4 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
- I agree this should be done. It seems it can be done by changing it to
<span class='use-with-mention'>feminine form of <span class='mention'>{{l|{{{lang|}}}|{{{1}}}|{{{2|{{{1}}}}}}|sc={{{sc|}}}|tr={{{tr|}}}|gloss={{{gloss|}}}|g={{{g|}}}|g1={{{g1|}}}|g2={{{g2|}}}|g3={{{g3|}}}}}</span></span><noinclude>{{documentation}}</noinclude>, but someone should confirm that.—msh210℠ (talk) 06:57, 19 August 2012 (UTC)Reply
- How about
{{form of|feminine form|{{{1}}}|{{#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|{{{1}}}}}|lang={{{lang|}}}|sc={{{sc|}}}|tr={{{tr|}}}}}? (As you know, I'm not exactly a fan of {{form of}}, but {{feminine of}} already has most of the same problems, so I don't think it'll make {{feminine of}} any worse.)
One difference between this approach and yours is that yours will show the transliteration in boldface, while this will not. On the other hand, your approach will support gloss and gender(s), while this one will not, but if we want that in {{feminine of}}, then it seems like we'd want it at {{form of}}, too.
—RuakhTALK 13:10, 19 August 2012 (UTC)Reply
- Sounds good to me.—msh210℠ (talk) 05:45, 20 August 2012 (UTC)Reply
- Done.—msh210℠ (talk) 08:15, 13 January 2013 (UTC)Reply