Template talk:ja-kref

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Template talk:ja-kref. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Template talk:ja-kref, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Template talk:ja-kref in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Template talk:ja-kref you have here. The definition of the word Template talk:ja-kref will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofTemplate talk:ja-kref, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

February 2010

I've significantly modified this template to improve its syntax and to allow for the listing of common cross-references to major Japanese-Engligh character dictionaries in addition to Japanese-specific encoding standards. Currently, the template is not in widespread use, so the changes shouldn't affect too many articles.--Dcmacnut 21:37, 18 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Documentation

In line with the addition of the Documentation page feature, I've moved the documentation content there. This Talk page is now just for that -- talking.  :) -- Eiríkr ÚtlendiTala við mig 15:09, 6 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

RFD discussion: October 2016–September 2022

The following information has failed Wiktionary's deletion process (permalink).

It should not be re-entered without careful consideration.


Not used as often as it theoretically could be. But why would anyone want this? Surely these dictionaries have their own indexes? And the encoding information is probably only useful to programmers (if at all in this Unicode-dominated day and age), who definitely wouldn't come to Wiktionary to find out. —suzukaze (tc) 05:14, 9 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

If we really want this data we could centralize it in an Appendix. —Suzukaze-c 08:42, 17 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

@KevinUp It hasn't been deprecated, just nominated for deletion because "I Don't Like It". —Suzukaze-c 05:30, 25 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

I would support deleting these templates, because this information is more suitable for a database such as Wikidata:Q3595028. KevinUp (talk) 07:35, 25 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

RFD-deleted This, that and the other (talk) 11:21, 26 September 2022 (UTC)Reply