seems wrong with the <span class="searchmatch">ja</span> module? I don't seem to be able to create some simple katakana entries, e.g. ネスト (nesuto) with {{subst:<span class="searchmatch">ja</span>-<span class="searchmatch">new</span>||n|nest|d=nest|syn=巣}}...
parameters: "<span class="searchmatch">ja</span>-go-su|現|あらわ" to generate (if "arawa" is generated from "あらわ"), as in 現す (arawasu), a "go-dan" verb (5): ====Conjugation==== {{<span class="searchmatch">ja</span>-go-su|現|あらわ|arawa}}...
{{ko <span class="searchmatch">new</span>/hj}}. eg. {{subst:ko <span class="searchmatch">new</span>/hj|열역학|[[thermodynamics]]}} but a lot of the words are shared with Japanese or Chinese, and {{<span class="searchmatch">ja</span>-<span class="searchmatch">new</span>}} and {{cmn-<span class="searchmatch">new</span>}}...
I notice that some languages have nice templates like {{<span class="searchmatch">ja</span>-<span class="searchmatch">new</span>}}, {{th-<span class="searchmatch">new</span>}} to create <span class="searchmatch">new</span> entries, which are backed by modules and do lots of fancy...
==Japanese== {{<span class="searchmatch">ja</span>-kanjitab|よ|yomi=k}} ===Verb=== {{<span class="searchmatch">ja</span>-verb|さける|type=2}} # {{alternative spelling of|<span class="searchmatch">ja</span>|除ける}} The <span class="searchmatch">new</span> format with {{<span class="searchmatch">ja</span>-see}} has not been...
anything that isn't in the switch will categorize as {{{2}}}s, such as {{<span class="searchmatch">ja</span>-pos|r|adverb form}} would categorize in Category:Japanese adverb forms. It...
I propose we change {{<span class="searchmatch">ja</span>-na}} since 形容動詞 (keiyōdōshi) do not actually conjugate. Instead, the copula conjugates, e.g. だ (da), です (desu), or である (de aru)...
they only need to add a "suffix" to the POS label. (Using {{<span class="searchmatch">ja</span>-pos}} as the name of the <span class="searchmatch">new</span> label template was a mistake because that name was already...
Template talk:<span class="searchmatch">ja</span>-usex/archive See 海行かば. Tested a very large usage example, how much characters can this template can handle without reaching the did not...
multi-character words? eg. 求婚 - きゅうこん. Should it produce {{<span class="searchmatch">ja</span>-kanjitab|きゅう|こん|yomi=on}} or {{<span class="searchmatch">ja</span>-kanjitab|yomi=on}} ? What about the suru verb in that entry...