Template talk:ko-noun

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Template talk:ko-noun. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Template talk:ko-noun, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Template talk:ko-noun in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Template talk:ko-noun you have here. The definition of the word Template talk:ko-noun will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofTemplate talk:ko-noun, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

Remake based on Template:ja-noun and Template:cmn-noun

Latest comment: 17 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

I don't really see the point in having these three parameters in the template. I think I am right in saying that subject, topic, and direct object are indicated by post-posisioned particles, which are always the same, and do not change the form of the noun either (unless the noun is conjoined with the particle to form some colloquial shortening, which I doubt is formal and which could be mentioned in usage notes). Anyway, it is clear that there will never be articles for all Korean words with every possible particle attached; that's just ridiculous. On the other hand, I see a lot missing in this template. This template would be really useful if it worked similarly to Template:ja-noun and Template:cmn-noun, where one first specifies form of writing (in the case of Korean, hangeul or hanja), then inludes the other form in a parameter (if it exists), and in another parameter inline hangeul jamo for proper alphabetizing. There's only a handful of entries using this template now, so it should be easy converting them. – Krun 16:59, 27 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

The code could be:
<includeonly>{{#switch:{{{1}}}|hg='''{{PAGENAME}}'''|hj={{PAGENAME}}}} (<!--
-->{{#switch:{{{1}}}|hg=''hangeul'', <nowiki/>|hj=''hanja'', <nowiki/>|}}<!--
-->{{#ifeq:{{{count|}}}|-|''uncountable'', <nowiki/>|{{#if:{{{count|}}}|''counter'' {{wlink|{{{count}}}}}, <nowiki/>}}}}<!--
  -->{{#if:{{{hangeul|}}}|''hangeul'' {{JAchar|{{wlink|{{{hangeul}}}}}}}, <nowiki/>}}<!--
  -->{{#if:{{{hanja|}}}|''hanja'' {{JAchar|{{wlink|{{{hanja}}}}}}}, <nowiki/>}}<!--
  -->{{#if:{{{rv|}}}|''revised'' '''{{wlink|{{{rv}}}}}'''}})<!--
  -->{{#if:{{{mr|}}}|''McCune-Reischauer'' '''{{wlink|{{{mr}}}}}'''}})<!--
-->]</includeonly><noinclude>
Korean nouns. For usage, see the ].
]
</noinclude>
Any further ideas? – Krun 17:37, 27 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
Edit: I went ahead and changed the template, but I see that the particles aren't always the same. There must be some rule, though… The best thing would be to find out for each word its inflection category and link to an appendix that teaches how to apply these particles. – Krun 19:08, 27 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
They aren't always the same, and I don't really see what makes these particles so different from declension endings in other languages, but I've long since lost this argument. -- Visviva 10:22, 16 September 2007 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Is there any reason to link to the MR transliteration? I doubt most such transliterations would meet CFI. Rod (A. Smith) 20:25, 19 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Agreed, and done. Not sure how I missed that the first time. It seems that I am quite incapable of making a "clean" edit to this template... good thing I'm not the only one minding the store. ;-) -- Visviva 03:06, 20 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Broken

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This template seems to not work on Romanized entries. I can't work out what it's trying to achieve, therefore I can't (yet) fix it. Mglovesfun (talk) 13:06, 31 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Wikious
Boobota
Sagapedia