Template talk:nl-misspelling

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Template talk:nl-misspelling. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Template talk:nl-misspelling, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Template talk:nl-misspelling in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Template talk:nl-misspelling you have here. The definition of the word Template talk:nl-misspelling will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofTemplate talk:nl-misspelling, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

Deletion debate

The following information has failed Wiktionary's deletion process.

It should not be re-entered without careful consideration.


A point of view pushing tool. We already have {{misspelling of}}. Very strong delete. Mglovesfun (talk) 09:32, 1 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Orphan & Delete. --Bequwτ 02:37, 3 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
It seems to have already been orphaned, I hope it was replaced by a usage note to the same effect. While the template should not exist in its current form, I would not object to it being rewritten as a line of text to put into Usage notes. We should not arrogantly ignore standards, though we should not rely solely on them either. Conrad.Irwin 00:07, 9 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
That's not a bad idea. Maybe {{misspelling of}} should contain a link to Wiktionary:Misspellings. Although that doesn't exist yet, I think it probably should using the 'draft policy' (or daft policy??) template. Mglovesfun (talk) 14:38, 25 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
I really hate those 2-0 deletion decisions, could someone else comment? Or else I will delete it (at some point). Mglovesfun (talk) 11:24, 9 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
Delete. I see no point in it being kept. Cdhaptomos talkcontribs 18:17, 16 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Deleted. Mglovesfun (talk) 10:13, 18 April 2010 (UTC)Reply