Template talk:plural

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Template talk:plural. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Template talk:plural, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Template talk:plural in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Template talk:plural you have here. The definition of the word Template talk:plural will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofTemplate talk:plural, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

Purpose

What is the purpose of this template? It is used in the inflection line and as a context to state that the term is the plural form, and in the inflection line followed by a colon to provide the plural form, and who knows what else. 59.112.51.139 14:30, 21 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

This template is obsolete - we now use {{en-noun}}. Jonathan Webley 15:46, 21 October 2006 (UTC)Reply
The template is used in the several Latin conjugation tables for formatting. --EncycloPetey 00:57, 25 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
If that's the only place it's used, it should be subst:ed and deleted, as you can write ''plural'' instead of {{plural}} without losing any information whatsoever. Amazing really. Mglovesfun (talk) 15:09, 15 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

RFDO discussion: June 2013–April 2014

The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for deletion/Others.

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


I've never understood why these exist, they contain precisely ''plural'' and ''singular'', so they save precisely zero keystrokes, with no added functionality. Most of the transclusions are via inflection templates (like for Latin) where they can be simply subst:ed with no drawbacks. Mglovesfun (talk) 20:12, 7 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

I agree, delete them. But they also have some transclusions through {{context}}, and we can't get rid of those currently. —CodeCat 20:22, 7 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
Could change them to {{context|in the plural}} though. Mglovesfun (talk) 20:27, 7 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
MewBot is currently occupied, so could you do that? —CodeCat 20:30, 7 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
Done, though there are some legitimate uses of singular and plural in context labels that remain, but aren't harmful. Mglovesfun (talk) 09:28, 10 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

There are {{in the plural}} and {{plural only}}Michael Z. 2013-06-21 19:09 z

The way {{plural}} is currently used (like this), it is unnecessary and undesirable. I am cleaning up ~40 such uses now. - -sche (discuss) 04:17, 10 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
{{plural}} and {{singular}} have only singular uses now. Most remaining uses of {{plural}} are in Italian nouns. Pinging User:SemperBlotto, as I am not sure what to do with these. Keφr 16:54, 24 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
There are also some Latin uses in the inflection (conjugation) table. --kc_kennylau (talk) 17:02, 24 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Both orphaned in main namespace and deleted. Keφr 08:14, 25 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

RFC discussion: August 2014–January 2015

The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for cleanup (permalink).

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


About 62 main-namespace pages uses this nonexistent template. I suppose the solution is to have a bot incorporate the information that the term is plural into the preceding headword-line templates somehow. - -sche (discuss) 08:46, 5 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

There are no longer any main namespace pages which use this template. I don't know who cleaned them up or how, but this is resolved. - -sche (discuss) 04:36, 12 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
Probably MewBot when it added {{context|}} in front of all the context labels. Renard Migrant (talk) 17:52, 12 January 2015 (UTC)Reply