I've seen this template used on entries in non-English languages. Should this template take a language parameter and then subcategorize the word according to language? --Bequw → ¢ • τ 08:09, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
{{rfdef}} is added, so it may not be too critical. Only two items in this category were here before the start of December. --EncycloPetey 01:37, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
The formatting is a bit weird, the <noinclude>{{documentation}}</noinclude> should come last, and the whole template should only categorize in the main namespace. That would render demo= obsolete (I prefer nocat anyway). Also, it should accept {{{1}}} as well as {{{lang}}}. Any objections/further comments? Mglovesfun (talk) 15:29, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
demo vs. noca: demo is used in some other templates, and is better than nocat in that it ({{{demo|]}}}) doesn't use #if, which nocat does. Likewise:) Using demo rather than #if:{{NAMESPACE}} to test for mainspace use saves on #if use (and allows for greater customization of use, e.g. allowing someone to not categorize an entry in ns:0 or to categorize an entry in an appendix). I don't think it should be switched over. I agree it should allow 1 as a synonym of lang, but existing uses should be checked first to make sure 1's not being used to store a comment. I agree re documentation.—msh210℠ (talk) 05:51, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
{{rfd}}, so only NS:0 and appendices will categorize. The reason for appendices is that we have appendices with definitions, such as languages that don't mean CFI (such as Klingon and Lingua Franca Nova). becomes obsolete as if it's used on any Wiktionary: or Talk: pages, it already won't categorize with the namespace check. Mglovesfun (talk) 12:29, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
subvectus needs translation but page is locked. Suggested translation: conveyed upwards; having been conveyed upwards. El3na-arvna (talk) 09:17, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
published this in the wrong place how do i delete El3na-arvna (talk) 09:20, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Howdy! I request the template be modified to display the 2nd parameter for comments. I recommend the following verbiage: This term needs a translation to English. Particularly: . Please help out and add a translation, then remove the text {{rfdef}}. Justification: a user who wants to contribute will be required to view the entry's source to discover what the requestor is asking for. In my case, to request for a 2nd sense of an Esperanto term: loko, I must use an {{attention}} tag to prompt editors to review the comment via the editor. Additionally, for consistency amongst similar templates such as {{rfp}}. TranqyPoo (talk) 21:41, 22 July 2025 (UTC)