Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word
Template talk:rfquote. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word
Template talk:rfquote, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say
Template talk:rfquote in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word
Template talk:rfquote you have here. The definition of the word
Template talk:rfquote will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition of
Template talk:rfquote, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
Durably archived citations are required to meet the criteria for inclusion, but a durably archived quotation might not be the best example of use. Why does this template ask specifically for durable archived quotations?—msh210℠ 17:26, 17 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
- Do we want to include non–durably-archived quotations in entries? —RuakhTALK 00:10, 18 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
- I don't see that they're worse than made-up example sentences.—msh210℠ 03:21, 20 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
- That's a door that shouldn't be opened. Otherwise, we get contributors making up sentences on websites, then adding them here. The citations are intended to bolster RFV and CFI, not simply to show use. --EncycloPetey 03:28, 20 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
- That's a good point, but if we're worried about such deceptiveness, then Usenet is a much bigger gap in our defenses, so to speak. :-/ —RuakhTALK 03:47, 20 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
- I suppose not, but they're not necessarily better than made-up example sentences, either; and do we want to encourage the addition of potentially unverifiable content to entries? I see arguments both ways. —RuakhTALK 03:47, 20 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
- I suppose wants good example sentences, he can use template:rfex. Fair enough.—msh210℠ 20:53, 21 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
Should this be a bit smaller and tidier? It dominates entries a bit. Mglovesfun (talk) 17:49, 1 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
- I think that's the intent. Basically, this template means "I don't want to RFV this for some reason, but I think this entry could use some verification." —RuakhTALK 21:50, 1 March 2010 (UTC)Reply