Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word
Template talk:rfv-passed. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word
Template talk:rfv-passed, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say
Template talk:rfv-passed in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word
Template talk:rfv-passed you have here. The definition of the word
Template talk:rfv-passed will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition of
Template talk:rfv-passed, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
I think this should have a better icon...maybe filing it into a file cabinet, or something? --Connel MacKenzie T C 06:33, 31 May 2006 (UTC)Reply
This template really should link to the section of the appropriate archive, right? Is the reason it does not currently, only technical? I think an earlier iteration of this template very nicely included the actual discussion (cut-n-pasted) from RFV. That method might be better, after all. --Connel MacKenzie T C 18:17, 16 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
- Yes. Such discussions should go along with this template on the talk page, with the archive leaving links to these terms and/or their talk pages. — Vildricianus 18:20, 16 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
- If it can be done it would be great! Otherwise, I can just put the discussion on the talk page manually. Please let me know if it can be done. Andrew massyn 18:28, 16 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
- Also, Wiktionary:Survived verification process isn't really necessary I guess. — Vildricianus 18:23, 16 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
- True. When we created the template, we wern't sure whether it needed a category page to go with it or not. I would be happy if it were deleted, but am not confident enough to delete it myself. :) Andrew massyn 18:28, 16 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
- See Template talk:archive box#RFDO discussion: August–December 2014.