Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word
Template talk:ru-verb. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word
Template talk:ru-verb, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say
Template talk:ru-verb in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word
Template talk:ru-verb you have here. The definition of the word
Template talk:ru-verb will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition of
Template talk:ru-verb, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
Needs work. Surely more parameters than this are needed. Mglovesfun (talk) 20:16, 12 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
Could these parameters be restored and if the opposite form is not transliterated, then the template would transliterate them manually from pf/impf (opposite form)? I also liked the older style more (with em-dash and no brackets). --Anatoli (обсудить/вклад) 20:28, 17 October 2013 (UTC)Reply
- I prefer it if the template fits with how other headwords are displayed. We don't normally transliterate inflected forms, not even for Gothic where otherwise I've been very rigorous in transliterating everything (because students generally don't learn the Gothic script). —CodeCat 22:10, 17 October 2013 (UTC)Reply
- I've brought it up on the BP because if we do adopt it, it would make sense to do it for more languages than just Russian. —CodeCat 22:27, 17 October 2013 (UTC)Reply
The template could use alternative imperfectives, similar to perfective forms.
распу́хнуть pf (raspúxnutʹ) - пу́хнуть impf (púxnutʹ) or распуха́ть impf (raspuxátʹ).
BTW, will the "tr=" parameter be available for derived terms for all PoS, e.g. (пе́рвый (pérvyj) - пе́рвого (pérvovo)), where the genitive form would require manual transliteration? --Anatoli (обсудить/вклад) 23:55, 21 October 2013 (UTC)Reply
- It doesn't have the impf2= parameter already? —CodeCat 23:58, 21 October 2013 (UTC)Reply
- Oops, sorry, my bad. --Anatoli (обсудить/вклад) 00:13, 22 October 2013 (UTC)Reply
связать/связаться
is it possible to form passive verbs using suffixes other than -сь/-ся? d1g (talk) 12:32, 18 April 2017 (UTC)Reply
- There are four ways to make passive constructions:
- using the suffixes -сь/-ся:
- Дипломная работа выполняется студентами.
- using 3rd person plural (usually without a pronoun):
- Где продают компьютеры?
- using the verb быть and a short-form participle:
- Вся информация будет записана секретарём.
- In addition, present-passive or past-passive participles can be used:
- Журнал, читаемый студентом.
- Журнал, купленный вчера братом, скучный. —Stephen (Talk) 05:59, 19 April 2017 (UTC)Reply
- The entry связа́ться (svjazátʹsja) does what's required. The definition #3 is
{{passive of|связа́ть|lang=ru}}. I have just fixed the mode.--Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 05:55, 19 April 2017 (UTC)Reply