Template talk:sa-ima1s

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Template talk:sa-ima1s. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Template talk:sa-ima1s, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Template talk:sa-ima1s in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Template talk:sa-ima1s you have here. The definition of the word Template talk:sa-ima1s will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofTemplate talk:sa-ima1s, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

RFD discussion: October 2018–April 2019

The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for deletion (permalink).

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


This only contains a bunch of categories, which aren't necessary in the first place. —Rua (mew) 11:57, 21 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

It was on Beer parlour and on the talk page of भवामि that it decided to not add categories manually on sanskrit non lemmas and rather devise some new method. JainismWikipedian (talk) 12:08, 21 October 2018 (UTC)Reply
Yes, and in that same discussion, people already expressed disagreement with the creation of all these categories. Yet you did it anyway. —Rua (mew) 12:11, 21 October 2018 (UTC)Reply
There's consensus to get rid of these, but there are a bunch more ({{sa-ima3s}}, {{sa-pra1d}}, etc, etc) and I don't have the time to orphan them all now so that the templates and categories can be deleted. If someone else wants to do it, that would be much appreciated. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 07:13, 18 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
@Benwing2: Could you please orphan all these templates so we can delete them and the categories they add? —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 19:09, 5 April 2019 (UTC)Reply
@Metaknowledge I orphaned and deleted all the templates. The templates were as folows:
templates = [
  "sa-ima1s",
  "sa-ima3p",
  "sa-ima3s",
  "sa-imp3s",
  "sa-poa3s",
  "sa-pra1d",
  "sa-pra1p",
  "sa-pra1s",
  "sa-pra2s",
]
There are a bunch of categories; not all are empty because some are added manually. I think you can find all the categories by looking at the subcategories of Category:Sanskrit verb forms. Benwing2 (talk) 23:41, 5 April 2019 (UTC)Reply
@Benwing2: I didn't realise there were so many manual ones, but it'll still be a pain to remove them unless you can run a script to do so. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 00:27, 6 April 2019 (UTC)Reply
@Metaknowledge All the manual categorizations are removed, along with the resulting empty categories. Benwing2 (talk) 06:56, 6 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Why? Categorisation gone too far. —Rua (mew) 11:59, 21 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Delete this already, on User talk:JainismWikipedian § poscatboiler module the creator already regretted the idea behind this and like categories after manifold reprehension. Fay Freak (talk) 00:06, 7 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
I don't think he regretted it, TBH. Per utramque cavernam 12:23, 19 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
Delete, pointless category. Per utramque cavernam 19:42, 9 November 2018 (UTC)Reply