Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Template talk:slim-wikipedia. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Template talk:slim-wikipedia, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Template talk:slim-wikipedia in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Template talk:slim-wikipedia you have here. The definition of the word Template talk:slim-wikipedia will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofTemplate talk:slim-wikipedia, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
RFM
Latest comment: 11 years ago8 comments5 people in discussion
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
These two templates serve the same purpose, only the appearance differs. It doesn't really make much sense that some entries use one and some use the other, that is really the personal preference of the editors. So I think that there should be only one template, but users should be able to customise the appearance so that it looks like either the full version or the slim version as they prefer. —CodeCat22:10, 1 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
Oppose. {{wikipedia}} adds an unnecessary amount of clutter to the page. {{slim-wikipedia}} does the same job, without the unnecessary image, without the unnecessarily detailed (and sometimes incorrect) text, and wasting less vertical space. — Ungoliant(Falai)23:00, 1 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
Oppose merger. The slim-vs.-fat preference is not merely personal: it depends also on the particular entry. Specifically, an editor who normally uses the fat version may well use the slim one on an entry that has other floating boxes (images, primarily). So it'suseful to have both templates.—msh210℠ (talk) 17:08, 14 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
