Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word
Template talk:table:colors/sla-pro. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word
Template talk:table:colors/sla-pro, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say
Template talk:table:colors/sla-pro in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word
Template talk:table:colors/sla-pro you have here. The definition of the word
Template talk:table:colors/sla-pro will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition of
Template talk:table:colors/sla-pro, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
It's broken. There are stray semicolon, default text at some place and not at others. --Per utramque cavernam (talk) 11:31, 21 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
- @Per utramque cavernam: The template
{{table:colors}} (which this one is built on) has been broken for a long time, as a side-effect of different editors constantly changing it to reflect their preferred organization. In any case, it is a very poor fit for the color systems of pre-modern languages, as it tries to shoehorn them all into a single set alien to their native semantic distinctions. For Proto-Slavic I think any solution that could accurately represent the color system would have to reject the common template and use a custom one instead (as I also had to do for Egyptian). Having a common template for colors cross-linguistically was a bad idea in general. — Vorziblix (talk · contribs) 21:27, 21 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
- @Vorziblix: Ah yes, I see. Yes, I think you're right that colors don't lend themselves well to that kind of systematisation.
- Incidentally, you've convinced me to vote delete here. --Per utramque cavernam (talk) 22:06, 21 March 2018 (UTC)Reply