Template talk:trans-top2

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Template talk:trans-top2. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Template talk:trans-top2, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Template talk:trans-top2 in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Template talk:trans-top2 you have here. The definition of the word Template talk:trans-top2 will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofTemplate talk:trans-top2, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

Useless template

Latest comment: 18 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

Why would we ever need this? Translations are not entered on project pages (e.g. Wiktionary: namespace) and {{tocright}} is never used in the main namespace (NS:0, where the bulk of the content resides.) --Connel MacKenzie 00:26, 13 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Aw, fudgesicles. And here I thought I was being very clever. The edit preview of the use of trans-top2 with tocright2 over on albino looks really great, too. <sigh> Didn't realize that tocright* were no-nos in articlespace. So, I guess this template can just go straight to the bitbucket. I was trying to push the actual content of the page up and have the ToC float, so that people don't have to scroll such a long ToC to get to the actual meat of the article. — SMcCandlish ツ 00:35, 13 January 2007 (UTC)Reply
Demo, for the curious: or just revert back to the "More template fun" version of albino, while this template still even exists. — SMcCandlish ツ 00:52, 13 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Also, wouldn't a simple "|width=66" optional parameter in the original template work better? --Connel MacKenzie 00:27, 13 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Didn't want to mess with the original, since I couldn't guarantee the clear and width changes wouldn't have unforseen consequences on some page I wasn't looking at. — SMcCandlish ツ 00:35, 13 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

RFD discussion

Latest comment: 12 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

The following information has failed Wiktionary's deletion process.

It should not be re-entered without careful consideration.

As above. SemperBlotto (talk) 11:33, 18 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Delete. It's a seriously bad idea to mess with {{trans-top}}, any changes to that should be discussed on the talk page before implemented as it's so widely used. I say treat this as a no longer used sandbox, and delete it. Mglovesfun (talk) 11:58, 18 July 2012 (UTC)Reply
Deleted. User: PalkiaX50 talk to meh 20:58, 24 July 2012 (UTC)Reply


Wikious
Boobota
Sagapedia