Template talk:usage less fewer

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Template talk:usage less fewer. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Template talk:usage less fewer, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Template talk:usage less fewer in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Template talk:usage less fewer you have here. The definition of the word Template talk:usage less fewer will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofTemplate talk:usage less fewer, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

RFC discussion: January 2010

The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for cleanup (permalink).

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


This passed RFD on the grounds it was better to improve it than delete it. I have orphaned it from the one page that used it so the cleanup won't be visible on the article itself. Mglovesfun (talk) 15:14, 15 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

You don't really get this one at all :p. The reason behind templates like this is so that improving them improves the entry (or entries) they are included on. That said, the usage notes of both less and fewer do need cleaning, the person doing the cleanup can decide whether to use the template or not. (I've undone your orphaning as it broke the link on less). Conrad.Irwin 20:46, 16 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
The header ====Usage notes==== is in the template itself, meaning that when you click 'edit' on less, it edits this template, not the article. So that's the first thing to fix. Mglovesfun (talk) 16:44, 17 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
Done, any complaints? Mglovesfun (talk) 04:56, 25 January 2010 (UTC)Reply