This template expects Wikisaurus entries to contain subpages named "/def", containing a definition.
The template is mostly unused. Plain markup like "See also ]" is mostly used instead. See also WT:WS#Mainspace.
The appearance of the template with the markup {{ws_refer|rich|wealthy}}
:
When used as {{ws_refer|rich|wealthy}}
, the template links to the entry "Wikisaurus:rich_(wealthy)", a format of headwords that is currently unused.
Examples of definitions in the "/def" subpages:
Source code:
*] ] has an entry for “''']'''” in {{#ifeq:{{{2}}}|{{PAGENAME}}|this sense|the sense of “{{{2|{{Wikisaurus:{{{1}}}/def}}}}}”}}.<noinclude>]</noinclude>
I discourage the use of this template. The template {{ws refer}}
is currently used in less than 100 entries, while "See also ,"framed":false,"label":"Reply","flags":,"classes":}'>Reply
The following information has failed Wiktionary's deletion process.
It should not be re-entered without careful consideration.
This Wikisaurus template makes use of a needlessly complicated technique of "/def" subpages, so I ask for its deletion.
Via this request, I also ask that the "/def" subpages get deleted. The subpages are the following: Wikisaurus:tiny/def, Wikisaurus:ephemeral/def, Wikisaurus:speedy/def, Wikisaurus:quickly/def, Wikisaurus:scrawny/def, Wikisaurus:obese/def, Wikisaurus:impoverished/def, Wikisaurus:gigantic/def, Wikisaurus:wealthy/def, Wikisaurus:enrage/def, Wikisaurus:fatigued/def. The def pages are used only by this template.
The talk page of the template (Template talk:ws refer) lists all the slash-def subpages and the source code of the template, so anyone can restore the idea if, in future, the editors of Wikisaurus arrive at the conclusion that the complexity introduced by the template is worth it.
Here is how the template's use looks like:
Here is the alternative currently used in most pages that link to Wikisaurus:
Here is another alternative sometimes used, listing some synonyms before the link to Wikisaurus:
--Dan Polansky 12:00, 18 April 2011 (UTC)