Thread:User talk:CodeCat/A problem with Template:circumfix

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Thread:User talk:CodeCat/A problem with Template:circumfix. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Thread:User talk:CodeCat/A problem with Template:circumfix, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Thread:User talk:CodeCat/A problem with Template:circumfix in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Thread:User talk:CodeCat/A problem with Template:circumfix you have here. The definition of the word Thread:User talk:CodeCat/A problem with Template:circumfix will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofThread:User talk:CodeCat/A problem with Template:circumfix, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

Hi CodeCat. Currently, when {{circumfix}} is used, it generates three links, one for the circumfixed antecedent term, and one each for the preceding and following parts of the circumfix; this results in links to pages that may be utterly irrelevant or even non-existent. Take the example of the Georgian word უბრალო (ubralo), in the entry for which {{circumfix|უ- -ო|უ|ბრალი|ო|lang=ka}} currently displays this:

*უ- (*u-) doesn't exist and -ო (-o) contains nothing relevant; both the links on either side of ბრალი (brali) should link to უ- -ო (u- -o). {{circumfix|უ- -ო|უ|ბრალი|ო|lang=ka}} should display this:

Unless I'm missing something, all that should be necessary is to pipe the links for the first and third terms, so that they link to the proper page, for the circumfix. Would you be able and willing to edit {{circumfix}} to correct this bug, please? Thanks for your time.