To be fair to <span class="searchmatch">Dan</span> <span class="searchmatch">Polansky</span>, I have been disruptive on English wikipedia and have trolled there. I'm not doing that here, but I understand why he is concerned...
familiar with <span class="searchmatch">Code</span><span class="searchmatch">Cat's</span> behavior at <span class="searchmatch">User</span>_<span class="searchmatch">talk</span>:80.114.178.7#Unblock_2 easily recognize the hypocrisy of the above post. There, <span class="searchmatch">CodeCat</span> made ample use...
must have read some other <span class="searchmatch">talk</span> page. All I saw was her referring strictly to his behavior on Wiktionary when discussing the <span class="searchmatch">block</span> and the reasons for it...
grinds me even more is that he's openly calling for you to be <span class="searchmatch">blocked</span>, on your own <span class="searchmatch">talk</span> page which is meant to be for messages directed to you, but directed...
are a bit over the top. But you recognise that too already, calling for a <span class="searchmatch">block</span> is way too much. I'm not going to call you a troll either, hopefully I can...
that something pushes a sysop over the edge and he issues an unwarranted <span class="searchmatch">block</span>. I have done it myself. Perhaps you should try to be a little less annoying...
sometimes on English wikipedia, but I have not done that here at all. So I can see why <span class="searchmatch">Polansky</span> would think I'm doing that here, even though I'm not....
You dodged my question, are you still pushing for me to be <span class="searchmatch">blocked</span>?...
So are you saying you agree with him that I should be <span class="searchmatch">blocked</span>?...
I still do not think he should be banned or <span class="searchmatch">blocked</span>. If anything is done, there should just be a mutual interaction ban between him and me....