8 Results found for "Thread:User_talk:CodeCat/Why_the_rush".

Thread:User talk:CodeCat/Why the rush?/reply

Why? The consensus for that is not so strong at all, so we should work on the things that there is agreement for first....


Thread:User talk:CodeCat/Why the rush?

There were some discussions about moving the gloss parameter in "mention" templates. I think we should resolve them first before changing everything to...


Thread:User talk:CodeCat/Why the rush?/reply (2)

I think there was enough consensus to implement something and see if it sticks. The disagreements were about quite minor details....


Thread:User talk:CodeCat/Why the rush?/reply (6)

whether this is a good idea at all. Or simply to make more people aware of the idea before suddenly converting everything at once and making it a fait accompli...


Thread:User talk:CodeCat/Why the rush?/reply (3)

not decided whether a change is even desirable. The nice thing about {{l}} and the likes is that the two term parameters mimic how plain wikilinks work...


Thread:User talk:CodeCat/Why the rush?/reply (7)

Well there's nothing preventing you from creating a separate template, {{m2}} or the like, and experiment with it....


Thread:User talk:CodeCat/Why the rush?/reply (5)

bot twice, and time isn't really an issue either is it? In fact, to change the parameters around we would need to create tracking categories/templates first...


Thread:User talk:CodeCat/Why the rush?/reply (4)

chance to be teſted in a ſmall ſcale before changing all templates. And by þe way: I would like to ſee a |nongloss= parameter (or ſimilar) added to templates...