Thread:User talk:CodeCat/Your placement of various "nyms"

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Thread:User talk:CodeCat/Your placement of various "nyms". In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Thread:User talk:CodeCat/Your placement of various "nyms", but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Thread:User talk:CodeCat/Your placement of various "nyms" in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Thread:User talk:CodeCat/Your placement of various "nyms" you have here. The definition of the word Thread:User talk:CodeCat/Your placement of various "nyms" will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofThread:User talk:CodeCat/Your placement of various "nyms", as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

I've noticed that you've been moving a lot of nyms to directly under the senses, as at maths. There have been a few users who have mentioned not liking this, including myself (see this Beer Parlour discussion from February--I think there was another discussion on it as well, but I'm not sure where). I was just wondering if it would be possible to change the templates you're using to display nyms in the same way that quotations are hidden, so that they wouldn't create so much clutter around the definition lines. Multiple users have mentioned liking the way the Simple English Wiktionary does it in some entries (see simple).

Is this something you could do easily enough? Do you have any objections to making them collapsable? I much prefer having nyms under individual senses, but the way it is now clutters up the entry too much, I think.