Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word
Thread:User talk:Yair rand/newentrywiz.js/edit summary. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word
Thread:User talk:Yair rand/newentrywiz.js/edit summary, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say
Thread:User talk:Yair rand/newentrywiz.js/edit summary in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word
Thread:User talk:Yair rand/newentrywiz.js/edit summary you have here. The definition of the word
Thread:User talk:Yair rand/newentrywiz.js/edit summary will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition of
Thread:User talk:Yair rand/newentrywiz.js/edit summary, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
Currently the edit summary just says e.g. "+en:verb (NEC)". I don't know about anyone else, but I at least, when patrolling recent changes, use the fact that the edit summary of a page creation displays the content of the page: it helps me catch obviously bad edits. Would it be possible to change the edit summary to something like "NEC: "? (The "en:verb" wouldn't be necessary, as the headers would be shown.)—msh210℠ (talk) 19:37, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
- I often use just the definition, maybe that would be worth considering? Conrad.Irwin 19:53, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
- Oh, of course. I hadn't thought that the edit summary could be propagated by the contents of the various fields. Yes, just the definition (or the langcode and definition, or the langcode, POS, and definition) would be wonderful IMO if feasible.—msh210℠ (talk) 19:56, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
Moved from header. --Yair rand (talk) 20:36, 30 June 2010 (UTC)