Transwiki talk:Trike (insult)

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Transwiki talk:Trike (insult). In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Transwiki talk:Trike (insult), but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Transwiki talk:Trike (insult) in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Transwiki talk:Trike (insult) you have here. The definition of the word Transwiki talk:Trike (insult) will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofTranswiki talk:Trike (insult), as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.


Transwiki:Trike (insult)

Trike as an insult in the Dallas area - lacks valid citations. Goldenrowley 04:40, 23 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Unverifiable, looks like a hoax, and at best very messy.
The putative book “Cook, L. On the Formation of Insults. London: Bloomsbury, 1997.” does not exist (red flag), the putative etymology is garbage (Old English or Old French origins for a word first supposedly attested in 2003), and the supposed “Old English” (deprecated template usage) traik is actually Torres Strait Creole (?) (thank you Ptcamn), which is in Australia, not Texas. Also couldn’t find other citations – with this much against it, suggest delete.
—Nils von Barth (nbarth) (talk) 20:27, 8 June 2010 (UTC)Reply
The only user who has provided any support is the user who wrote it, User:Vndzr (which looks like a garbage name), whose only contributions were writing this page. No-one else has said anything in support, and this has been open a while. Seems an open-and-shut hoax, and accordingly deleting.
—Nils von Barth (nbarth) (talk) 02:40, 27 June 2010 (UTC)Reply