User:Gamren/Lojban

Voting on: Establishing the inclusion criteria for Lojban.

This vote implicitly absolved Lojban terms from having to satisfy the WDL criteria, but did not specify any new criteria for inclusion. This vote presents four options, in increasing order of inclusiveness. Lower-numbered proposals take precedence over higher-numbered ones. This vote does not in any way influence the placement of the language in mainspace or Appendix-space.

Proposal 1: WDL

Lojban is readded to the list of well-documented languages, and must satisfy the full inclusion criteria.

Proposal 2: LDL

Lojban is considered a less-documented language, and words require one durably-archived usage. Mentions are unusable for verification.

Proposal 3: WDL + jbovlaste

Lojban words may be entered if they satisfy the full inclusion criteria, or have an entry in http://jbovlaste.lojban.org/.

Proposal 4: LDL + jbovlaste

Lojban words require either a durably-archived usage or an entry in http://jbovlaste.lojban.org/.

Schedule:

• Vote starts:
• Vote ends:
• Vote created:

Discussion:

• Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2018-04/Disallowing_appendix-only_languages
• Wiktionary:Votes/2018-02/Moving Lojban entries to the Appendix
• Wiktionary:Beer_parlour/2018/April#Disallowing_Appendix-only_constructed_languages
• Wiktionary:Beer_parlour/2018/June#On_the_placement_of_constructed_languages,_and_on_the_attestation_of_appendix-only_languages