User talk:恨国党非蠢即坏

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word User talk:恨国党非蠢即坏. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word User talk:恨国党非蠢即坏, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say User talk:恨国党非蠢即坏 in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word User talk:恨国党非蠢即坏 you have here. The definition of the word User talk:恨国党非蠢即坏 will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofUser talk:恨国党非蠢即坏, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

Sorry

Hello, I don't plan to edit the 战狼 page anymore. I want you work with you to edit the dictionary, not get into internet fights. The edit I wanted is not important, and I don't want to interfere with your creative viewpoint on the dictionary. I tend to add too many links and view character readable in Chinese languages and Japanese etc as characters, not just 'Chinese'. My mindset is Traditional characters as default. But I don't want to fight over that kind of minor stuff. Keep editing! It is fun. Geographyinitiative (talk) 10:16, 22 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Module tests

If you want to test modules, you can use mod:sandbox. -- Huhu9001 (talk) 03:00, 16 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

@Huhu9001: Nice. You should have told me that earlier. 恨国党非蠢即坏 (talk) 03:18, 16 November 2020 (UTC)Reply
You could also make modules under your own username, like MOD:User:恨国党非蠢即坏/sandbox. — justin(r)leung (t...) | c=› } 05:11, 16 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

世界 Etymology

Hi there, I noticed you were the one who added Kumarajiva as the originator of 世界 in the etymology section. However, the word exists in translations prior to his life, including the 正法華經 by Dharmarakṣa, so I don't know what source you're using for Kumarajiva, but I have removed the specific attribution to him. There are "older attributions" to the Han/Wei periods as well but those are probably spurious, but Dharmarakṣa is a fairly well-attested source. Kungming2 (talk) 02:18, 10 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Alright. Thank you. 恨国党非蠢即坏 (talk) 09:34, 10 April 2024 (UTC)Reply