User talk:3210

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word User talk:3210. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word User talk:3210, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say User talk:3210 in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word User talk:3210 you have here. The definition of the word User talk:3210 will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofUser talk:3210, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

You were thinking of Monastir User:SemperBlotto

Atatürk

We do not include Translations on non-English pages. We leave that to the other Wiktionaries. See WT:ELE. --EncycloPetey 20:22, 11 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Manastır

I have reverted this edit. That is not what we use the {{see}} template for. The template is for words whose letter sequence are the same, but which have or lack diacritical marks. --EncycloPetey 20:48, 11 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

thanks a lot.--]] <sup><font size="-2">]</font></sup> 21:00, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
You did the same again . Please spend some time looking at our formatting before you continue. You are eager to add content, but you need to know how to add information properly. --EncycloPetey 21:10, 11 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Kara

You may be thinking of kara (with a lower-case "k". Wiktionary is case-sensitive. --EncycloPetey 23:46, 13 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

JARGON

TURKISH IS USUALLY NOT SPELLED IN ALL CAPITAL LETTERS. :) --EncycloPetey 04:23, 26 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Turk

Template:WP I have no idea if that sense is real. Just that isn't how we delete things; we use {{rfv-sense}}. It does claim to be archaic so it might be real. I'll try and find who added it. Mglovesfun (talk) 12:17, 2 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

It was added by Vahagn Petrosyan, so could be complete nonsense. Mglovesfun (talk) 12:22, 2 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
You're a complete nonsense. It's in OED "Applied to any one having qualities attributed to the Turks; a cruel, rigorous, or tyrannical man; any one behaving as a barbarian or savage; one who treats his wife hardly; a bad-tempered or unmanageable man" with quotes going back from modern times to 1536. --Vahag (talk) 13:01, 2 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
If you don't mind if I say that: The old litarature for example ansiklopedia britanicca says that Turks mean "order", "sober", "self dsiplinied". After the Ottoman Empire some Armanians such as in this case Petrosyan and other say nonsense definitions for propaganda reson. It ıs not true. JUST PROPOGANDA... --]] <sup><font size="-2">]</font></sup> (talk) 14:01, 2 December 2013 (UTC)Reply