. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word
, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say
in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word
you have here. The definition of the word
will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition of
, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
Hello, welcome to Wiktionary, and thank you for your contributions so far.
If you are unfamiliar with wiki-editing, take a look at Help:How to edit a page. It is a concise list of technical guidelines to the wiki format we use here: how to, for example, make text boldfaced or create hyperlinks. Feel free to practice in the sandbox. If you would like a slower introduction we have a short tutorial.
These links may help you familiarize yourself with Wiktionary:
- Entry layout (EL) is a detailed policy on Wiktionary's page formatting; all entries must conform to it. The easiest way to start off is to copy the contents of an existing same-language entry, and then adapt it to fit the entry you are creating.
- Check out Language considerations to find out more about how to edit for a particular language.
- Our Criteria for Inclusion (CFI) defines exactly which words can be added to Wiktionary; the most important part is that Wiktionary only accepts words that have been in somewhat widespread use over the course of at least a year, and citations that demonstrate usage can be asked for when there is doubt.
- If you already have some experience with editing our sister project Wikipedia, then you may find our guide for Wikipedia users useful.
- If you have any questions, bring them to Wiktionary:Information desk or ask me on my talk page.
- Whenever commenting on any discussion page, please sign your posts with four tildes (
~~~~
) which automatically produces your username and timestamp.
- You are encouraged to add a BabelBox to your userpage to indicate your self-assessed knowledge of languages.
Enjoy your stay at Wiktionary! Ultimateria (talk) 17:32, 14 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
Hi Ain92, and welcome to Wiktionary. If you're going to work on reconstructed proto entries, I need to ask that you source your edits. Simply putting "per Beekes" or "per de Vaan" in the Edit summary will not suffice. We have a lot of pre-made Proto-Slavic and Proto-Indo-European reference templates which makes it really easy. Let me know if you need any help. --Victar (talk) 14:26, 26 October 2018 (UTC)Reply
{{der}}
, {{inh}}
, {{bor}}
, etc. should only be used when the language in question is treated by Wiktionary as a different language. That's because their main purpose is to add the entry to a derivation category, which makes no sense if a language is basically deriving from itself.
For instance, molybdaenum is itself New Latin, so Category:Latin terms derived from New Latin, which was added by {{der|la|NL.}}
, would be deceptive. Any such categories would have to be deleted, anyway, because the category templates are programmed to display a module error in those cases.
If you want to show the language name, just use {{cog}}
or its synonym {{noncog}}
, which don't categorize.
Thanks! Chuck Entz (talk) 18:31, 23 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
What does "actual corn" mean here? Maize? AFAIK buckwheat is an actual corn in the (older) sense of the word, so clarification would be helpful. Thanks! - -sche (discuss) 20:37, 21 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
- I thought that it was unambiguous in context, but it seems actually it wasn't) Fixed in both Latin and Cyrillic spellings. BTW, if you are interested in the etymology of this word, check a good review on pp. 23–25 here. Ain92 (talk) 21:31, 21 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
- The rest of the sentence is also questionable, "introduced to Croatia from Southern Europe around 1611," because Croatia is southern from my perspective and because Albania and Ottoman Turkish in the Balkans at the time(?) are so close I suspect it would be a semantic loan into an undefinable area anyway, before becoming fully integrated into the language. Accepting what Chuck said in the previous thread about language taxonomy and seeing there are sources I don't doubt that the etymology is essentially correct. I even understand that "south" is a matter of perspective. And I have confused corn before, too! I'm just saying, since it is relevant to my interests, that the etymology so far leaves room for speculation. 2A00:20:6055:790B:2949:12A4:4BCC:1E81 12:45, 10 October 2022 (UTC)Reply