My current project is to fill in the firefighting entries that are missing. This makes sense since I am a firefighter. I'll get into my other interests later...
Hi Catseyes818, welcome to Wiktionary. It's great that you are entering terms used in your particular field.
Thanks for your comment on my talk page. I would suggest adding "(firefighters' jargon)" (without the quotation marks) immediately before the definition, as in the following made-up example:
#(''firefighters' jargon'') A fire that produces a lot of smoke.
(Note that what might appear to be quotation marks are actually pairs of apostrophes, which italicise the text they contain.)
I am a sysop here, so if you have an queries on anything at all that you can't find answers for elsewhere, please feel free to contact me on my talk page. — Paul G 09:36, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Welcome to Wiktionary. Just holler at my talk page if you have any questions or need any help. Kevin Rector 22:01, 6 May 2005 (UTC)
"Able to oxidize with exposure to atmospheric oxygen at normal temperatures." was your original definition, but is not in any dictionary that I have access to. Iron oxidizes to rust in the presence of atmospheric oxygen, but isn't pyrophoric because it doesn't burst into flame. By all means, add an additional definition, but I'm pretty sure it will have to involve flame or sparks. Cheers. SemperBlotto 15:21, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
Hm, I have done some Googling. Have a look at , . Fire people do seem to use the word differently. By all means add the source of your definition, especially when it differs to that in standard dictionaries. SemperBlotto 21:41, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
Hi there again. By the way, I notice that you have piped several links to avoid red ones. We normally leave them red here to show what words haven't been defined yet. No big deal. SemperBlotto 15:28, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
Hello,
The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.
Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Catseyes818. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Catseyes818~enwiktionary that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.
Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation
23:42, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)
06:58, 21 April 2015 (UTC)