Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word
User talk:Father of minus 2. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word
User talk:Father of minus 2, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say
User talk:Father of minus 2 in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word
User talk:Father of minus 2 you have here. The definition of the word
User talk:Father of minus 2 will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition of
User talk:Father of minus 2, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
/Archive
You're a productive editor, I'll give you that. However, you are not a trusted editor. What, even, is the point of having all these sockpuppet accounts? If you disposed of them all, and maintain one disclosed account for a time, you could regain that trust. bd2412 T 22:14, 25 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
Hi B. You're one of the users here whose opinion WF most values.
- Yes, WF's very productive. Too productive for WF's liking, to be honest!
- The point is partly to avoid replying to dumb messages, and to have backup accounts in the unlikely event one should be blocked. Also, they're not technically sockpuppets, just alternatives...
- WF thinks your last point about regaining trust is misguided.
- If you're blocking WF for closing RFD/RFV, that's cool - it is the least fun thing WF does, and WF'd be delighted to be disallowed from closing the discussions. In fact, WF might mis-close a few more, just in order to get banned from doing it!
- Anyway, see you in much less than 3 days!
Father of minus 2 (talk) 22:37, 25 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
- I may be in the wrong here, I honestly don't know the community consensus on this. I have asked for guidance. bd2412 T 22:43, 25 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
- Ooh, WF always likes community discussions about themself! Gives editors sth to do while WF is off making this dictionary better. Father of minus 2 (talk) 22:49, 25 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
- Unget an account. 2A00:23C5:FE1C:3701:FD1C:68CD:8DB8:EAC0 22:51, 25 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
- I'm not trying to make trouble here, I'm just looking for clarity. bd2412 T 00:41, 26 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
- FWIW, I'm 80-90% sure 2A00... is also WF Purplebackpack89 00:44, 26 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
- @Purplebackpack89 Well I'm 100% sure who you are, because you linked your full name YouTube channel from your old user page on Wikipedia, but apparently it's OUTING when anybody sneezes near you. Grow up buddy. 2A00:23C5:FE1C:3701:FD1C:68CD:8DB8:EAC0 10:28, 26 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
Could you please remove all the mainspace links to any entry you are marking as RFV or RFD failed? You can track them from Special:WhatLinksHere or from "Tools" -> "What links here" on the page. It would actually be very helpful. Svārtava (tɕ) 11:08, 4 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
Would you consider this term to be SOP? I would appreciate your feedback. mysteryroom (talk) 21:50, 30 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
- Not my concern, sorry. Father of minus 2 (talk) 22:19, 30 May 2025 (UTC)Reply