Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word
User talk:FokkerTISM. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word
User talk:FokkerTISM, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say
User talk:FokkerTISM in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word
User talk:FokkerTISM you have here. The definition of the word
User talk:FokkerTISM will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition of
User talk:FokkerTISM, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
I was wondering two things, the second being dependent on the first. The first, is Mongolian your first language, or are you especially fluent in it? The second, if the first is yes, would you like to work with me on some templates for Mongolian noun forms? Something that looks like voverė#Declension. — — 15:49, 19 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
- I'm only learning Mongolian. I find the language to be interesting. FokkerTISM 01:02, 20 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
- As do I. It's currently completely foreign to me. As such... it sits in my mind as a mystery to be cracked. It's a nag. Also, it lacks templates here which... is going to eventually drive me crazy. Everything needs coverage. Everything. Pardon my intense rant. Esrarı seviyorum. — — 05:40, 20 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
Names of individual people in the form of first name + second name are expressly forbidden here. Some single-named individuals are allowed on the grounds they are a single word; Plato; Socrates, Charlemagne et al. Thank you, Mglovesfun (talk) 13:21, 20 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
- Is Camus allowed by any chance? FokkerTISM 13:24, 20 August 2011 (UTC) (just his surname)Reply
- In what language? See Camus. Mglovesfun (talk) 13:24, 20 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
- Камю /qɑmʉ/ in Mongolian/Russian, Камју /kɔmju/ in Azeri and Ками /kamiː/ in Serbian and Macedonian. FokkerTISM 13:27, 20 August 2011 (UTC)Reply