Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word
User talk:Jerzy. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word
User talk:Jerzy, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say
User talk:Jerzy in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word
User talk:Jerzy you have here. The definition of the word
User talk:Jerzy will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition of
User talk:Jerzy, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
I'm a Wikipedia user who seldom ventures here. Don't expect a reply that is anywhere near being timely, to msgs editted onto this page. Better you should leave a msg on my Wikipedia w:User talk:Jerzy page.
Our style guide actually dictates no spaces in headers, so ===Header=== instead of === Header ===, so if you could desist in adding them (spaces), it would be appreciated. Any questions, feel free to ask. Thanks. -Atelaes λάλει ἐμοί 00:24, 23 May 2010 (UTC)Reply
- Thanks for the heads up, and i'll try, especially if it has a visible effect. The main barrier to it is that i edit over here so seldom that it'll usually be a distant memory; the facts that jamming them togther is often an obstacle to editing, & w:WP:PAPER, are side issues. But as i say, i'll try.
--Jerzy•t 05:32, 23 May 2010 (UTC)Reply
- No worries. When writing in two languages, confusion between the two almost inevitably results. Do your best. As far as I can tell, it has no visible result in the page, we're just really finicky about our code here. -Atelaes λάλει ἐμοί 05:50, 23 May 2010 (UTC)Reply
- Trying not to be such a piss-ant (which i assumed Vonnegut would not be so coarse as to use, so that he must, tres sophisticante, have meant pee-zahnt).
--Jerzy•t 05:49, 13 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
Actually, the two words you are concerned about was entered in this edit, i.e. the very first edit to the entry. And to make it worse, it was an anonymous contributor. However, it was added as "related terms", not "derived terms". That change was made here.
As for the actual question, I do not work on etymologies and only rarely other forms of relationships, as I don't feel I have the prerequisite knowledge, so I am happy to leave this question for you, DCDuring and whoever else feel they can contribute.
Regards, \Mike (talk) 00:55, 19 July 2012 (UTC)Reply
What discussion are you referring to? DTLHS (talk) 15:52, 25 January 2017 (UTC)Reply
- @DTLHS Patience. Having labelled the absurdity, i was already in the midst of commenting in more detail, and will review in an effort to understand my contribution to your confusion when i next save.
--Jerzy•t 16:46, 25 January 2017 (UTC)Reply