Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word
User talk:Jtle515. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word
User talk:Jtle515, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say
User talk:Jtle515 in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word
User talk:Jtle515 you have here. The definition of the word
User talk:Jtle515 will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition of
User talk:Jtle515, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
Hello!
Please be careful when using the template {{compound}}, as specifying the lang=ang will cause the word leman to be categorised as an Old English compound word, when it is rather English. Thanks! Leasnam (talk) 21:43, 20 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
- Actually, the reference to Old English really doesn't belong, as the word was formed in Middle English so far as we know (it is unattested in OE). Saying it is equivalent to lief + man will allow users to research the derivation of each component separately. Otherwise, if you can find where it is likely that it existed in OE (which by the ME form leofman, which looks like early ME, and thus probable that it did), you can use *lēofmann (“dear one, darling”) for the reconstructed form. Leasnam (talk) 21:48, 20 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
Hi. Thanks for all your good edits. Please don't remove a sense you doubt: instead use {{rfv-sense}} (or, if the sense is redundant to another, {{rfd-redundant}}; the page ] explains how to use both templates).—msh210℠ (talk) 19:29, 10 July 2012 (UTC)Reply
The word (deprecated template usage) oaken is not an example of word formation using this suffix. See the etymology of oaken, and note that it derives from a word that existed in Middle English. --EncycloPetey (talk) 20:56, 4 January 2013 (UTC)Reply