Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word User talk:Miziktizik. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word User talk:Miziktizik, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say User talk:Miziktizik in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word User talk:Miziktizik you have here. The definition of the word User talk:Miziktizik will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofUser talk:Miziktizik, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed:
This has to be one of the stupidest accusations ever leveled against me in the history of this site, and it is an grossly inappropriate accusation to boot. I know for a fact that you cannot show any evidence to support any of it. — SURJECTION/ T / C / L /21:40, 20 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
Why did you ban me permanently then? You allow pedophilic pages to be made like pedophilia slang. Should we also allow zoophilia and cannibal slang? Miziktizik (talk) 22:03, 20 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
You still have not shown a single example. Besides, allowing a page to exist is not the same as promoting whatever its content is. If the content is attestable per our criteria for inclusion, excluding it because you, I, anyone or even the vast majority of the world's population doesn't agree with its content is not justified; instead we show the disapproval towards it by using the appropriate labels and usage notes. You were blocked because you levelled an extremely severe, inappropriate and entirely unfounded accusation, the kind that if expressed in real life would likely end up with you in court over defamation, against another editor without any evidence. — SURJECTION/ T / C / L /22:11, 20 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
you want examples? okay. some of the links aren't that bad but they prove you're obsessed with pedophilia:
for example i don't understand why toddlercon, cunny, minor-attracted person etc. are on wiktionary, shouldn't it be on some degenerate anime and other wikis? i've seen some people complaining about you (saying you're racist and xenophobic, you reject other users' corrections and block users for no good reason), so it's not just me. Miziktizik (talk) 23:13, 20 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
Grrr. All I see is Surjection reverting vandalism on these pages (and statistically this is a very small fraction of the pages that Surjection reverts vandalism on). We are a descriptive dictionary whose purpose is to describe "all words in all languages", which means that inevitably we contain entries for words referring to illegal activities. That hardly means we condone those activities. Benwing2 (talk) 01:34, 21 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
...so my edits on pages, primarily to roll back vandalism, that have to do with pedophilia, including reverting edits that have tried to whitewash these terms and remove any mentions of pedophilia from them, proves that I am "obsessed with pedophilia"? How did you even find these specific pages out of all of the ones I have edited over the years? Do you even listen to what you are saying? — SURJECTION/ T / C / L /06:58, 21 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
i can't see some of your reverted edits because they're removed. you seem to whitewash the terms too. well, i'm not surprised, everyone knows what you admins and mods are Miziktizik (talk) 17:53, 21 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
