Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word
User talk:Msh210/Archive/SUL Box. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word
User talk:Msh210/Archive/SUL Box, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say
User talk:Msh210/Archive/SUL Box in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word
User talk:Msh210/Archive/SUL Box you have here. The definition of the word
User talk:Msh210/Archive/SUL Box will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition of
User talk:Msh210/Archive/SUL Box, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
This page is an archive of old discussion. Please don't edit this page. If you wish to communicate with me (msh210), you can do so at User talk:Msh210. Thanks!
Yes, they are currently forbidden, which is why I am considering starting a vote concerning this particualr template, if there seems to be agreement that it is useful and acceptable. Do you have an opinion on this? If there is a strong feeling against such templates, then I won't waste the community's time with a vote. --EncycloPetey 21:41, 20 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
- Sigh. Nothing wrong with that one, but I'm afraid of the slippery slope, as I see what happened on WP with userboxes. I don't know....—msh210℠ 21:48, 20 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
- Re that slippery slope: I can picture some people wanting to use w:template:user SUL, some user global, some SUL Box, some user unified login. And then what about template:user 1RR, user wikipedia/Administrator, a wikt port of User Wikipedian For, w:user:EVula/Userboxes/admin somewhere since, a wiktport of w:user:SoWhy/UBX/possibleadmin, user bot, user bot owner, w:User:Foxy Loxy/userbox/antivandal, user helper, et cetera? I think I'm going to have to opine "no" on this.—msh210℠ 23:49, 28 January 2009 (UTC)Reply