User talk:Msh210/Archive/inflection-line context templates

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word User talk:Msh210/Archive/inflection-line context templates. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word User talk:Msh210/Archive/inflection-line context templates, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say User talk:Msh210/Archive/inflection-line context templates in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word User talk:Msh210/Archive/inflection-line context templates you have here. The definition of the word User talk:Msh210/Archive/inflection-line context templates will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofUser talk:Msh210/Archive/inflection-line context templates, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

This page is an archive of old discussion. Please don't edit this page. If you wish to communicate with me (msh210), you can do so at User talk:Msh210. Thanks!

Inflection-line "context" labels.

This is a good idea, and I'd like more information about it. Do you basically distinguish between certain templates that you always put on the sense line and others that you always put on the inflection line, or is it more of a case-by-case basis thing? If a word has only one sense, do you always use the sense line, or are there still cases where you use the inflection line? (Etc.) Now that I think about it, I vaguely remember that you used the inflection line for {{no longer productive}}, and I think I reflexively moved those to the sense line when I "context"-template-ified them, but now I realize that that probably wasn't what you'd had in mind? —RuakhTALK 01:31, 28 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

To answer your last question first, right, I intended it for the inflection line. See Category:Context labels for a classification of the context labels into five types, of which topical, grammatical, regional, and usage are relevant to this discussion. Of those, I tend to put topical labels on the definition line, and grammatical labels according to the following rule: If they apply equally to all senses, then on the inflection line; otherwise, on the definition line. Regional and usage labels I haven't been consistent about: in theory I'd like to treat them as I do grammatical labels, but I think I've mostly been putting them on the definition line anyway.​—msh210 16:54, 29 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
An example of the utility of inflection-line context tags is diff: I moved the rather lengthy tag to the inflection line in order to avoid repeating it twice.​—msh210 21:30, 29 June 2009 (UTC)Reply