Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word
User talk:Robert Ullmann/L2/invalid. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word
User talk:Robert Ullmann/L2/invalid, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say
User talk:Robert Ullmann/L2/invalid in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word
User talk:Robert Ullmann/L2/invalid you have here. The definition of the word
User talk:Robert Ullmann/L2/invalid will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition of
User talk:Robert Ullmann/L2/invalid, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
Check WT:LANGNAME to see if it's an alternative name.
Also see Wiktionary:LANGCODE#List_of_exceptions for a list of wiktionary-only language codes.
Just some notes on some of the persistent offenders so I don't have to relook up all the info over and over again. If anyone has any thoughts on how to clean these up, please feel free to contribute. -Atelaes λάλει ἐμοί 06:39, 17 October 2008 (UTC)Reply
- Ancient Chinese: May refer to Old Chinese or Middle Chinese
- Chaozhou = Teochew (see below)
- Gaulish: (Celtic) Multiple Gaulish languages; need to be clarified.
- K'iche': (Mayan): Multiple K'iche's; need to be clarified.
- Kaitij: Australian language (apparently), but no 'pedia article nor SIL code.
- Kurnai: (Australian), Dialect group, 'pedia article
- Middle Chinese: Has a 'pedia article. Some could be Late Middle Chinese (ltc)..
- Penobscot: See w:Penobscot#Language. It's Algonquian but not coded yet (ISO or here)
- Taimyr Pidgin Russian: No apparent 'pedia article nor SIL code.
- Teochew: Most sources treat this as a dialect of Min Nan.
- Toki Pona: (conlang) 'pedia article, but no SIL code. Not permitted by CFI.
- Wembawemba: (Australian) Has a 'pedia article (on the people who speak it, at least), but no SIL code.
Seneca is valid isn't it? See the template {{see}}. Mglovesfun (talk) 11:33, 22 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
- Yes, but there are technical issues that take time to resolve in segard to this. The
{{see}} template was originally our {{also}} template. We wanted to give a lot of time before we made the final switch, to be sure people no longer were using {{see}}, so Seneca entries are going to be called "invalid" for a little while longer even thoguh they're actually OK. --EncycloPetey 15:25, 22 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
Interesting to see all the invalid 'English' level 2 headers. Mglovesfun (talk) 14:25, 6 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
- ...and French, Japanese, Portuguese, etc. --EncycloPetey 15:47, 6 July 2010 (UTC)Reply