User talk:RubixLang

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word User talk:RubixLang. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word User talk:RubixLang, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say User talk:RubixLang in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word User talk:RubixLang you have here. The definition of the word User talk:RubixLang will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofUser talk:RubixLang, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

Welcome message

Welcome

Hello, welcome to Wiktionary, and thank you for your contributions so far.

If you are unfamiliar with wiki-editing, take a look at Help:How to edit a page. It is a concise list of technical guidelines to the wiki format we use here: how to, for example, make text boldfaced or create hyperlinks. Feel free to practice in the sandbox. If you would like a slower introduction we have a short tutorial.

These links may help you familiarize yourself with Wiktionary:

  • Entry layout (EL) is a detailed policy on Wiktionary's page formatting; all entries must conform to it. The easiest way to start off is to copy the contents of an existing same-language entry, and then adapt it to fit the entry you are creating.
  • Check out Language considerations to find out more about how to edit for a particular language.
  • Our Criteria for Inclusion (CFI) defines exactly which words can be added to Wiktionary; the most important part is that Wiktionary only accepts words that have been in somewhat widespread use over the course of at least a year, and citations that demonstrate usage can be asked for when there is doubt.
  • If you already have some experience with editing our sister project Wikipedia, then you may find our guide for Wikipedia users useful.
  • If you have any questions, bring them to Wiktionary:Information desk or ask me on my talk page.
  • Whenever commenting on any discussion page, please sign your posts with four tildes (~~~~) which automatically produces your username and timestamp.
  • You are encouraged to add a BabelBox to your userpage to indicate your self-assessed knowledge of languages.

Enjoy your stay at Wiktionary! -- माधवपंडित (talk) 14:12, 21 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

References

Be sure to put a bullet point before references, as in diff. —AryamanA (मुझसे बात करेंयोगदान) 16:14, 21 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

RubixLang, please add sources to all your PIE entries, otherwise I'm going to start adding deletion requests to them. --Victar (talk) 15:26, 16 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

RubixLang, adding blue links for the sake of blue links is not a good practice. Please stop creating poorly constructed PIE entries with no sources. You can't just expect other users to clean up your entries for you. --Victar (talk) 17:20, 2 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Inherited

Please only use {{inh}} for terms that are actually inherited, not terms that are derived. I fixed this at *dālom. —Rua (mew) 17:26, 7 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Gaulish

Gaulish is a virtually unattested language. The Gaulish words we have are Latin borrowings (see Proto-Celtic *bolgos), and should be labeled as such beside the Gaulish recostructions. Can you please fix some of your recent edits to reflect this? Thanks. --{{victar|talk}} 12:20, 7 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

StarLing and Proto-Afroasiatic

Please don't edit entries based on StarLing. They're notoriously unreliable, compiled by people with no domain-specific knowledge and full of transcriptional errors, ultimately biased toward supporting fringe hypotheses that the mainstream linguistic community (and Wiktionary) do not accept. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 22:29, 4 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

I'm having a hard time finding free sources outside some previews of books in Google Books. Do you have any suggestions? RubixLang (talk) 11:48, 5 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
There are no fully reliable sources for PAA. But this is a good lesson in general: protolanguages are complicated, contentious, and easy to get wrong. If you don't know much about any language, but especially a protolanguage, please don't edit those entries. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 01:39, 6 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

{{topics}}

Thanks for adding some categories to the Proto-Iranian entries. Just so you know though, the preferred method is to use the template {{topics}}, like done here. Thanks. --{{victar|talk}} 17:08, 1 October 2020 (UTC)Reply