User talk:WritersCramp

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word User talk:WritersCramp. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word User talk:WritersCramp, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say User talk:WritersCramp in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word User talk:WritersCramp you have here. The definition of the word User talk:WritersCramp will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofUser talk:WritersCramp, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed:

WritersCramp (block log • active blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • user creation log • change block settings • unblock)

Request reason:

The administrator who blocked my account is stocking me through my edits. I correctly changed the definition of the word sniper to the standard definition of the word in other dictionaries. Please look here, there are many examples. I attempted to discuss on the sniper talk page, which the administrator refused to do. Instead, he just kept reverting my work. I am in the right not the wrong. I request that my block be lifted. Thank you WritersCramp (talk) 20:10, 9 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Warning

Latest comment: 9 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I see that five different administrators in English Wiktionary have given you blocks over the years for various examples of unacceptable behaviour. Your recent edits contain more pages that you have created in contravention to the policies in WT:CFI. You are wasting other editors' time, and if you continue to do this you will be blocked for longer periods of time, and perhaps indefinitely. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 21:11, 4 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Metaknowledge (talk • contribs), please never permanently obstruct him. This guy is hilarious! Just see the below topic for more proof. --Romanophile (talk) 21:11, 9 May 2015 (UTC)Reply
Then thank CC for only giving him 3 months. I'd've permablocked him had I gotten there first. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 21:16, 9 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Most important thing about an entry, who created it?

Latest comment: 9 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Do you think that the most important factor in determining whether an entry should be kept or deleted is if you created it or not? Should all entries you create be kept because you created them? I am looking for a straight rather than an accusatory answer. Renard Migrant (talk) 21:28, 4 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Stick up your ASS - DICKHEAD!! WritersCramp (talk) 12:54, 9 April 2015 (UTC)Reply
But if you were to simplify your answer to just 'yes' or 'no', which would it be? Renard Migrant (talk) 22:00, 10 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

You are still being disruptive

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

So we still have to block you. You make egregious mistakes like defining cellmate (singular) as "inmates" (plural), and then kneejerk-revert anyone who cleans up your mess. Equinox ◑ 21:34, 29 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

You don't know what you're doing

Latest comment: 5 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

You don't know what you're doing, please stop. PUC – 12:54, 27 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Wikious
Boobota
Sagapedia