User talk:Zeggazo

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word User talk:Zeggazo. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word User talk:Zeggazo, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say User talk:Zeggazo in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word User talk:Zeggazo you have here. The definition of the word User talk:Zeggazo will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofUser talk:Zeggazo, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

Infinite

I would like to extend my block to infinite. I'm done with wiktionary for good. Zeggazo (talk) 08:01, 30 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Never mind. I've given you guys 3 and a half days to get rid of me but you did not take your opportunity. Zeggazo (talk) 14:59, 2 November 2014 (UTC)Reply
Let me know when you change your mind again. Keφr 20:48, 3 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

RFC discussion: October–November 2014

The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for cleanup (permalink).

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


Just… everything (including edits from Pass a Method's previous account). I lost my patience when he created genital- and Category:English words prefixed with genital-. This user ought to be blocked indefinitely. The definitions are poor and some terms seem plain made-up. The citations that are there are not in chronological order, and their quality is also questionable: do we really need to accept citations of usage by someone who cannot even be bothered to spell "Obama" with a capital letter (2009 citation here)? Keφr 06:29, 30 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

I've tidied a few, patrol-marked the good ones, and deleted some clear junk. Much more to do. Be especially suspicious regarding hyphens, since he never checked sources to see whether there was a hyphen in the word. (Google's snippets remove them at line endings.) Equinox 13:43, 30 October 2014 (UTC)Reply
Usenet citations, no matter the ambient orthography, are fine as citations of words, at least words with acceptable spellings themselves. Fast typing without capitalization could be considered evidence of the near-colloquial nature the speech recorded in Usenet. DCDuring TALK 13:46, 30 October 2014 (UTC)Reply
Not terribly relevant, but I can't think of any single-word compounds with 'genital' as the first word. Renard Migrant (talk) 15:23, 30 October 2014 (UTC)Reply
Add User:Zigguzoo to the list... Equinox 21:20, 8 November 2014 (UTC)Reply
Does this count as sockpuppetry now? Technically he switched accounts after his block expired. Keφr 14:40, 9 November 2014 (UTC)Reply
I want to stress the large number of bad sloppy entries and the high rate of ongoing creation. Equinox 22:17, 17 November 2014 (UTC)Reply