Wiktionary:About Old Tupi

Note: Wiktionary uses the ISO code tpw for this language, despite it being labeled differently in other places.

	This is a Wiktionary policy, guideline or common practices page. This is a draft proposal. It is unofficial, and it is unknown whether it is widely accepted by Wiktionary editors.
	Policies – Entries: CFI - EL - NORM - NPOV - QUOTE - REDIR - DELETE. Languages: LT - AXX. Others: BLOCK - BOTS - VOTES.

In Wiktionary, Old Tupi serves as an umbrella heading for all Tupi dialects as well as Línguas Gerais, namely:

• "North Tupi"
• "São Vicente Tupi"
• Tupinambá (tpn): spoken by the Tupinambá
• Tupinikin (tpk): spoken by the Tupinikin

• Guaraní (gn): distinct, but closely related language in the Tupi-Guarani family. Tupi and Guaraní have been mistakenly considered the same language in past centuries, when the Old Tupi lexicon was mostly unknown.
• Língua Geral: evolution of Old Tupi by further contact with Portuguese. It was split into two languages:
  • Língua Geral Paulista (LGP) or Meridional, spoken in Southeast Brazil and extinct by late 19th century;
  • Língua Geral Amazônica (LGA) or Setentrional, spoken in North and Northeast Brazil. Gave origin to nowadays Nheengatu.
• Nheengatu (yrl): evolution of LGA and only living decendant of Old Tupi, spoken in Venezuela, Colombia and the Brazilian states of Amazonas and Pará. Called "New Tupi" or "Modern Tupi" by some scholars, which causes the confusion.

• Old Tupi (1500–1700): Old Tupi de facto was spoken until the arrival of the Portuguese in 1500. Any new coinages or semantic loans set beyond this year are considered Late Tupi and should be labeled with {{lb|tpw|Late}}. The end is set at 1700 following Navarro's dictionary.
• Língua Geral Paulista (1701–19th c.): labeled {{lb|tpw|LGP}}, has no set end date as it had no decendants, but got extinct by late 19th century. The oldest dated mention is from 1863.
• Língua Geral Amazônica (1701–1852): labeled {{lb|tpw|LGA}}, fills the gap between Old Tupi and Nheengatu. The end date is explained bellow.
• Nheengatu (1853–present): the “Vocabulario da lingua indigena geral para o uso do Seminario Episcopal do Pará” (1853), by Manoel Justiniano de Seixas, is considered the first document written in Nheengatu, although it could be considered an "Old" or "Early Nheengatu" stage, as it still had many caracteristics of LGA that would disappeard later on. Nheengatu uses its own heading, see Category:Nheengatu language.

Old Tupi entries should use the ortography proposed by Navarro, based on Lemos Barbosa and Edelweiss. See more about its specifics in Appendix:Old Tupi pronunciation and Tupi language.

Some considerations:

• The glottal stop should be indicated by an apostrophe ⟨'⟩ , both in the entry's name and body. Other languages use a variety of symbols, including the right single quotation mark ⟨’⟩ , the modifier letter apostrophe (ʼ) , the saltillo ⟨ꞌ⟩ and the ʻokina ⟨ʻ⟩ . We will stick to the apostrophe until there is consensus in making a change.
  • In Navarro's spelling, the apostrophe is also used to indicate the omission of letters in verbal forms like the permissive and the negative.
  • The apostrophe should not be used to indicate stress, as some Portuguese dictionaries do.
• The hyphen ⟨-⟩ should not be used to separate different words or affixes in compounds. They are written in full, with no spaces. Different spellings are treated as non-lemma and should follow what is stated in Alternative forms.
  • Navarro uses the hyphen didactically in his books, as to show the parts that make up the word. The lemmas in his dictionary don't have it.
• When quoting Old Tupi from historical sources, try to keep both the original and current spelling systems. If this is not possible, give preference to the ortography described here. The uptated form is prefered because old texts usually have a complicated spelling, with inconsistent accentuation and separation of morphemes.
• The letter ⟨Ç⟩ should not be used entirely.

The name of the entry should include any diacritical marks present, which are Áá Éé Íí Óó Úú Ýý Ãã Ẽẽ Ĩĩ Õõ Ũũ Ỹỹ Îî Ûû Ŷŷ.

Old Tupi orthography was designed to have a one-to-one letter–phoneme correspondence. Different pronunciations, as the common ellision of final consonants in São Vicente Tupi, should have their own page with the corresponding spelling. These are considered non-lemma forms and should be handled as stated in WT:FORMS.

• Adjectives: under the Declension heading using {{tpw-adecl}}. Only works with non-pluriform adjectives. More templates planned for the future. See porang.
• Verbs: under the Conjugation heading using {{tpw-conj}}. Only works with regular verbs. More templates planned for the future. See nhe'eng.
• Other parts of speech (POS) should have no inflection table.

The lemma without any affixes is used for the entry name. The prefixed forms are handed differently depending on the POS:

• Pluriform nouns: listed only under the POS heading with {{tpw-noun}}.
• Pluriform adjectives: listed under the POS heading with {{tpw-adj}} and in the inflection table.
• Pluriform postpositions: listed under the POS heading with {{tpw-postp}}.
• Pluriform verb: listed under the POS heading with {{tpw-verb|pluri=1}} and in the conjugation table.

For Ib pluriform nouns i.e. the ones that have P/M alternation, the entry name should start with P, with the absolute form in M as non-lemma. See pokaba.

All nouns should be listed as either possessable or unpossessable, using {{tpw-noun}}. If some senses are possessable and others aren't, they should be separated in two headings. See karaíba.