The Oxford English Dictionary (OED) is a classic British dictionary made on historical principles. The purpose of this page is to document some of its practices since some may find them inspiring or interesting.
OED only includes words with evidence of "sufficiently sustained and widespread use": "Words that have not yet accumulated enough evidence for permanent record in the OED remain on the watch list for continued monitoring, while suggestions for words with sufficiently sustained and widespread use are assigned to an editor."
OED uses the language of attestation: "'One-eared' (= having only one ear) is entered as adj.1 in the dictionary, and is attested from the early seventeenth century. This entry illustrates the same form, but apparently as a misreading of one-yeared."
OED considers quotations from Usenet and Twitter. Twitter postings were the earliest evidence of use of words tweet and hashtag.
OED aims to be descriptive, rather than to act as "an arbiter of proper usage". It is not a "a subjective collection of usage ‘dos’ and ‘don'ts’." However, it does indicate which usages are or were regarded as "incorrect".
OED distinguishes affixes from combining forms; pro- is an affix while psycho- is a combining form.
About -otomy vs. -tomy: It lacks -otomy. It has -ocracy, -ology, -ologist, -ological, -olol, -ometer, and -ometry, all as combining forms. It has -osis. It lacks -ocyte, -ogenesis, -ogenic, -oleous, -olysis, -ophil, -ophile, -ophilia, -ophilic, -ophilous, -ophyte and -opore.
OED distinguishes initialisms from acronyms. Such items covered include 'NATO, EU, U.S., U.S.A., U.S.S.R., G.D.R., NASA, F.B.I., F.C.C., NBA, NHL, W.H.O., W.M.O., ECB, AMA, and OED but not FAA, FDA, APA and WTO.
Proper nouns are generally excluded, with some exceptions. A proper noun would sometimes have an entry not covering the direct referent as a sense, having the referent only in the etymology. As per New Yorker article: "James Murray, the dictionary’s first editor, made an early editorial decision that the O.E.D. would not include any proper nouns—this was regarded as the province of the encyclopedia, not the dictionary—and that words formed from proper nouns would likewise be excluded." Per a guide, "Proper names are not systematically covered by the dictionary, though many are entered because the terms themselves are used in extended or allusive meanings, or because they are in some way culturally significant."
Some examples:
Some included prefixed words:
Thus, hyphenation does not prevent OED from including an otherwise sum of parts term.
Suffixed words are not hyphenated in general, but for some of those suffixed with -less and -like.
OED has a hierarchically organized historical thesaurus. As per OED, "It can be thought of as a kind of semantic index to the contents of the OED."
Example entry locations:
Thus, the subordination relation is not strict hyponymy but is in part thematic.
Each node lists "subcategories". Non-leaf nodes often list no synonyms.
Each leaf and some non-leaf entries list its synonyms with a definition listed under each synonym.
For instance, node "a business or company " lists synonyms company, society, office, Co, concern, business, establishment, outfit, etc.; and it lists subcategories "profitable", "free of state control", "joint stock", "with limited liability", "multinational company", "large or powerful company", "other types of company", "companies involved in specific business", etc.
Reference templates:
{{R:OED Online}}
– the most up to date online version. Requires registration or library code.
{{R:OED Online|id=112003}}
– produces “Oxford English Dictionary”, in OED Online , Oxford: Oxford University Press, launched 2000.Other templates:
|