delete tag to this, but we've had it <span class="searchmatch">for</span> a long time. I think we should keep it. Robert Ullmann 16:16, 26 September <span class="searchmatch">2006</span> (UTC) A slight variation in transliteration...
May <span class="searchmatch">2006</span> (UTC) Do we or do we not need a policy <span class="searchmatch">for</span> this ? Only if you think we will never need such a policy should it be nominated <span class="searchmatch">for</span> <span class="searchmatch">deletion</span> (or...
when all is clear, <span class="searchmatch">request</span> <span class="searchmatch">deletion</span>. Elimination of useful templates is no improvement. --Connel MacKenzie T C 04:14, 17 February <span class="searchmatch">2006</span> (UTC) This may be...
that this would be it. Wiktionary:<span class="searchmatch">Requests</span> <span class="searchmatch">for</span> verification <span class="searchmatch">archive</span>/January <span class="searchmatch">2006</span>#ball horn, Wiktionary:<span class="searchmatch">Requests</span>_<span class="searchmatch">for</span>_verification#ball_horn_nope_-it.27s_from_Das_Capital...
end of 2003. Eclecticology 00:46, 13 February <span class="searchmatch">2006</span> (UTC) So why is the template nominated <span class="searchmatch">for</span> <span class="searchmatch">deletion</span>? We attribute Webster's 1913 in the same manner...
--Richardb 07:59, 17 June <span class="searchmatch">2006</span> (UTC) Looks like a bad enough code to get rid of it. — Vildricianus <span class="searchmatch">09</span>:12, 17 June <span class="searchmatch">2006</span> (UTC) As <span class="searchmatch">for</span> being autocratic, I am...
louder) 18:29, 9 May <span class="searchmatch">2006</span> (UTC) From the talk page of that entry: Hi, didn't find the entry on Wiktionary:<span class="searchmatch">Requests</span> <span class="searchmatch">for</span> <span class="searchmatch">deletion</span>, so I'll make my comment...
Wiktionary:<span class="searchmatch">Requests</span> <span class="searchmatch">for</span> <span class="searchmatch">deletion</span>/<span class="searchmatch">Archives</span>/<span class="searchmatch">2006</span>/06; you can search Wiktionary:<span class="searchmatch">Requests</span> <span class="searchmatch">for</span> <span class="searchmatch">deletion</span>/<span class="searchmatch">Archives</span> to find previous discussions, or look <span class="searchmatch">for</span> incoming...
here; not sure if it was short <span class="searchmatch">for</span> utter shite; it was certainly bowdlerised to useless)! --Enginear <span class="searchmatch">09</span>:56, 13 July <span class="searchmatch">2006</span> (UTC) By "utter nonsense" I meant...
Wikipedia. I object to Connel MacKenzie's <span class="searchmatch">requests</span> <span class="searchmatch">for</span> <span class="searchmatch">deletion</span>. Tedius Zanarukando 07:03, 20 December <span class="searchmatch">2006</span> (UTC) Because you are unable to comprehend...