Wiktionary:Votes/2007-08/Extension: DidYouMean

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Wiktionary:Votes/2007-08/Extension: DidYouMean. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Wiktionary:Votes/2007-08/Extension: DidYouMean, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Wiktionary:Votes/2007-08/Extension: DidYouMean in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Wiktionary:Votes/2007-08/Extension: DidYouMean you have here. The definition of the word Wiktionary:Votes/2007-08/Extension: DidYouMean will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofWiktionary:Votes/2007-08/Extension: DidYouMean, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

Extension: DidYouMean

  • Voting on: Turning on (via bugzilla) User:Hippietrail's DidYouMean extension on en.wiktionary.org, to auto-fill the {{see}} lines of every applicable entry at the WikiMedia software layer. A successful vote here will show general consensus that the Wiktionary community desires this software extension; that automatic/dynamic additions to the navigation "See also" links are desired.



Support

  1. Support Connel MacKenzie 04:37, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
  2. Support Cynewulf 16:50, 31 August 2007 (UTC) Oh, I see, it just gives a union of the stuff in the explicit {{see}} and the set of existing pagenames that normalize to the same thing as the current page; it doesn't edit the explicit {{see}}. Looks good.
  3. Support best, kevin 21:01, 1 September 2007 (UTC) Looks useful
  4. SupportRuakhTALK 22:52, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
  5. Support Thryduulf 11:02, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
  6. Support DAVilla 13:55, 2 September 2007 (UTC) although I would like to encourage Hippitrail to review the issue of order, even if it's a partial order i.e. keep the order of any explicit see terms, and fill in the rest where it seems most appropriate.
    I'm pretty sure he will when he's back online. If it goes a month or two, we could ask Brion to tweak it. --Connel MacKenzie 08:30, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
  7. Support H. (talk) 13:02, 3 September 2007 (UTC) Of course; we should automate everything which goes.
  8. Support Robert Ullmann 13:42, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
  9. Support Widsith 15:41, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
  10. Support Thecurran 04:49, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
  11. Support EncycloPetey 17:16, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
  12. Support Rod (A. Smith) 01:31, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
  13. SupportSaltmarshTalk 07:49, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

Abstain

Comments

Someone somewhere asked for a copy of the code. I ran across bugzilla:8648 which has it. Sorry for the delay. --Connel MacKenzie 21:30, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Decision