Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word
Wiktionary:Votes/2007-08/Extension: DidYouMean. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word
Wiktionary:Votes/2007-08/Extension: DidYouMean, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say
Wiktionary:Votes/2007-08/Extension: DidYouMean in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word
Wiktionary:Votes/2007-08/Extension: DidYouMean you have here. The definition of the word
Wiktionary:Votes/2007-08/Extension: DidYouMean will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition of
Wiktionary:Votes/2007-08/Extension: DidYouMean, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
Extension: DidYouMean
- Voting on: Turning on (via bugzilla) User:Hippietrail's DidYouMean extension on en.wiktionary.org, to auto-fill the
{{see}}
lines of every applicable entry at the WikiMedia software layer. A successful vote here will show general consensus that the Wiktionary community desires this software extension; that automatic/dynamic additions to the navigation "See also" links are desired.
Support
- Support Connel MacKenzie 04:37, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
- Support Cynewulf 16:50, 31 August 2007 (UTC) Oh, I see, it just gives a union of the stuff in the explicit
{{see}}
and the set of existing pagenames that normalize to the same thing as the current page; it doesn't edit the explicit {{see}}
. Looks good.
- Support best, kevin 21:01, 1 September 2007 (UTC) Looks useful
- Support —RuakhTALK 22:52, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
- Support Thryduulf 11:02, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
- Support DAVilla 13:55, 2 September 2007 (UTC) although I would like to encourage Hippitrail to review the issue of order, even if it's a partial order i.e. keep the order of any explicit see terms, and fill in the rest where it seems most appropriate.
- I'm pretty sure he will when he's back online. If it goes a month or two, we could ask Brion to tweak it. --Connel MacKenzie 08:30, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- Support H. (talk) 13:02, 3 September 2007 (UTC) Of course; we should automate everything which goes.
- Support Robert Ullmann 13:42, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- Support Widsith 15:41, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- Support Thecurran 04:49, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
- Support EncycloPetey 17:16, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
- Support Rod (A. Smith) 01:31, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
- Support —SaltmarshTalk 07:49, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
Oppose
Abstain
Someone somewhere asked for a copy of the code. I ran across bugzilla:8648 which has it. Sorry for the delay. --Connel MacKenzie 21:30, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
Decision